Stéphane Thobois1. 1. Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Lyon, France. stephane.thobois@chu-lyon.fr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Progressive reduction of the dose of one dopamine receptor agonist and simultaneous, progressive dose escalation of another is a frequently used strategy for controlling motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) or avoiding specific adverse events. Rapid switch has been proposed as an alternative that might reduce the need for such major limitations as the possible exacerbation of symptoms and the need to monitor patients for several weeks. However, the equivalence of doses of dopamine receptor agonists before and after switching drugs remains empirical because few clinical trials have addressed this issue. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to use the available data from the literature to calculate conversion factors for rapidly switching between dopamine receptor agonists in patients with PD. METHODS: Using the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library Central databases, we selected clinical trials that allowed paired comparisons of bromocriptine with the most frequently prescribed dopamine receptor agonists in PD (ie, pergolide, piribedil, pramipexole, and ropinirole). From these data, we calculated dose equivalents of optimal daily doses for each pair of dopamine receptor agonists. RESULTS: Six studies comparing 2 dopamine agonists and 4 studies analyzing the switch between dopamine agonists were selected. The proposed conversion factors were 1:6 for bromocriptine to piribedil, 1:6 for pergolide to ropinirole, 10:6 for bromocriptine to ropinirole, 10:1 for bromocriptine to pergolide, and 10:1 to 10:1.5 for bromocriptine to pramipexole. CONCLUSIONS: The conversion factors proposed in this article, based on a literature analysis, could facilitate rapid switches between dopamine receptor agonists in patients with PD, but they must first be confirmed in prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Progressive reduction of the dose of one dopamine receptor agonist and simultaneous, progressive dose escalation of another is a frequently used strategy for controlling motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) or avoiding specific adverse events. Rapid switch has been proposed as an alternative that might reduce the need for such major limitations as the possible exacerbation of symptoms and the need to monitor patients for several weeks. However, the equivalence of doses of dopamine receptor agonists before and after switching drugs remains empirical because few clinical trials have addressed this issue. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to use the available data from the literature to calculate conversion factors for rapidly switching between dopamine receptor agonists in patients with PD. METHODS: Using the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library Central databases, we selected clinical trials that allowed paired comparisons of bromocriptine with the most frequently prescribed dopamine receptor agonists in PD (ie, pergolide, piribedil, pramipexole, and ropinirole). From these data, we calculated dose equivalents of optimal daily doses for each pair of dopamine receptor agonists. RESULTS: Six studies comparing 2 dopamine agonists and 4 studies analyzing the switch between dopamine agonists were selected. The proposed conversion factors were 1:6 for bromocriptine to piribedil, 1:6 for pergolide to ropinirole, 10:6 for bromocriptine to ropinirole, 10:1 for bromocriptine to pergolide, and 10:1 to 10:1.5 for bromocriptine to pramipexole. CONCLUSIONS: The conversion factors proposed in this article, based on a literature analysis, could facilitate rapid switches between dopamine receptor agonists in patients with PD, but they must first be confirmed in prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trials.
Authors: E Lohmann; S Thobois; S Lesage; E Broussolle; S Tezenas du Montcel; M-J Ribeiro; P Remy; A Pelissolo; B Dubois; L Mallet; P Pollak; Y Agid; A Brice Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Karl Egger; Florian Amtage; Shan Yang; Markus Obmann; Ralf Schwarzwald; Lena Köstering; Irina Mader; Julia Koenigsdorf; Cornelius Weiller; Christoph P Kaller; Horst Urbach Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Ingrid de Chazeron; Franck Durif; Isabelle Chereau-Boudet; Maria Livia Fantini; Ana Marques; Philippe Derost; Berengere Debilly; Georges Brousse; Yves Boirie; Pierre Michel Llorca Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Mootaz M Salman; Zaid Al-Obaidi; Philip Kitchen; Andrea Loreto; Roslyn M Bill; Richard Wade-Martins Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 5.923