Literature DB >> 16490449

Comparison of heart rate reserve versus 85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate as a measure of chronotropic response in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Sripal Bangalore1, Siu-Sun Yao, Farooq A Chaudhry.   

Abstract

The role of heart rate (HR) reserve (HRR) in the risk stratification of patients who undergo dobutamine stress echocardiography is not well defined. This study evaluated 1,323 patients (mean age 63 +/- 13 years, 47% men) who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. Abnormal stress echocardiographic results were defined as those with stress-induced ischemia. HRR was defined as [(peak HR - HR at rest)/(220 - age - HR at rest)] x 100, with HRR <70% defined as low. Follow-up data (2.7 +/- 1.1 years) for confirmed myocardial infarction (n = 16) and cardiac death (n = 58) were obtained. HRR risk stratified patients into normal and abnormal subgroups (event rate 1.1%/year vs 4.2%/year, p <0.0001) and further risk stratified patients into normal (adjusted HR 1 [reference] vs 2.88, p = 0.04) and abnormal (adjusted HR 4.17 vs 10.09, p <0.0001) stress echocardiography groups. Low HRR (relative risk [RR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 4.01, p = 0.013) was an independent predictor of cardiac event even after controlling for standard cardiovascular risk factors, other stress electrocardiographic variables, and stress echocardiographic variables. Low HRR (chi-square 32) was superior to 85% maximum predicted HR (MPHR; chi-square 18) and provided incremental value over stress echocardiography and 85% MPHR (global chi-square increased from 48.3 to 54 to 61.3, p <0.0001) in a model consisting of stress echocardiography, MPHR, and HRR. In conclusion, HRR can further risk stratify patients who undergo dobutamine stress echocardiography and provides independent and incremental prognostic value over standard cardiovascular risk factors and also independent of echocardiographic myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction and is superior to 85% MPHR. In the setting of low HRR, normal stress echocardiographic results are prognostically less benign, whereas abnormal stress echocardiographic results are prognostically more malignant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16490449     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Stress testing in patients with chronic kidney disease: The need for ancillary markers for effective risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Rate adaptive pacing in people with chronic heart failure increases peak heart rate but not peak exercise capacity: a systematic review.

Authors:  H I Clark; M J Pearson; N A Smart
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Monitored anaesthesia care in the elderly: guidelines and recommendations.

Authors:  Margaret Ekstein; Doron Gavish; Tiberiu Ezri; Avi A Weinbroum
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor-recipient age difference.

Authors:  Patrick H Gibson; Fernando Riesgo; Jonathan B Choy; Daniel H Kim; Harald Becher
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.