Literature DB >> 16490094

ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance.

Melissa Wheeler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ProSeal LMA (PLMA) has recently been introduced in pediatric sizes (1.5, 2, 2.5, 3). Limited pediatric data have been published.
METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, the PLMA was placed in 120 children aged 4 months to 13 years (5-50 kg). The following data were collected prospectively: induction agent, number of placement attempts (limited to three), placement success or failure, PLMA size, leak pressure, ventilatory pattern [spontaneous (SV) or controlled positive pressure ventilation (PPV)], success or failure of gastric suction tube placement, hypoxemia, dislodgement, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, aspiration, and traumatic placement.
RESULTS: The PLMA was easily placed in children with a higher first attempt success rate (94%) than reported for adults. Overall PLMA and gastric tube placement were both 100% successful. Leak pressures were similar to those reported for the PLMA in adults and higher than reported for the Classic LMA in children. No bronchospasm, laryngospasm, hypoxemia, dislodgement, or aspiration occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the PLMA can be used with SV or PPV, the higher leak pressure achieved with the PLMA, and the ability to evacuate fluid and air from the stomach suggest that it may be a useful alternative to tracheal intubation for procedures in which PPV is desired in children aged 4 months to 13 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16490094     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01788.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme™ LMA and Proseal™ LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sook Hui Chaw; Ina I Shariffuddin; Li Lian Foo; Pui Kuan Lee; Ramona Maya Paran; Peak Chee Cheang; Lucy Chan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in infants.

Authors:  Eyyup Sabri Ozden; Basak Ceyda Meco; Zekeriyya Alanoglu; Neslihan Alkıs
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  [Clinical use of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask in infants, children and adolescents : prospective observational survey].

Authors:  K Goldmann; A Malik; C Hechtfischer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Prospective randomized comparative study of use of PLMA and ET tube for airway management in children under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Mamta G Patel; Vn Swadia; Geetika Bansal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-03

5.  Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.

Authors:  Gökhan Peker; Suna Akın Takmaz; Bülent Baltacı; Hülya Başar; Mustafa Kotanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-08-21

6.  Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zehra İpek Arslan; Canan Balcı; Duygu Akalın Oysu; Mehmet Yılmaz; Necla Gürbüz; Zekeriya Ilce
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Size 2.5 ProSeal(™) LMA: Is it associated with increased attempts at insertion?

Authors:  Aparna Sinha; Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

8.  The effect of head rotation on efficiency of ventilation and cuff pressure using the PLMA in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Hahck Soo Park; Jong In Han; Youn Jin Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-23

9.  Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA® ProSeal in children under controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Reesha Joshi; Priya Rudingwa; Pankaj Kundra; Sakthirajan Panneerselvam; Sandeep K Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.