Literature DB >> 16489875

The "hearing aid effect" 2005: a rigorous test of the visibility of new hearing aid styles.

Carole E Johnson1, Jeffrey L Danhauer, Reid B Gavin, Summer Raye Karns, Amber C Reith, Ilian Priscilla Lopez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The visibility of open ear (OE) styles of hearing instruments was rigorously investigated for their potential to reduce the stigma of wearing hearing aids.
METHOD: Three groups of 50 young adults (150 total) rated the visibility of 6 hearing aid styles-OE, invisible completely-in-the-canal (CIC), mini in-the-canal (m-ITC), half- and full-shell in-the-ear (ITE), and behind-the-ear (BTE)-worn by a peer model with revealing hairstyle, photographed from 2 ft and at 3 different angles (45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees).
RESULTS: CIC was rated significantly most "invisible" at 45 degrees and 90 degrees, OE and m-ITC were next at those angles, and OE and BTE were least invisible at 135 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings have implications for counseling potential users who are reluctant to try hearing aids for cosmetic reasons.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16489875     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/019)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  7 in total

1.  The stigma of hearing loss.

Authors:  Margaret I Wallhagen
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-07-10

2.  Effective Hearing Loss Screening in Primary Care: The Early Auditory Referral-Primary Care Study.

Authors:  Philip Zazove; Melissa A Plegue; Michael M McKee; Melissa DeJonckheere; Paul R Kileny; Lauren S Schleicher; Lee A Green; Ananda Sen; Mary E Rapai; Elie Mulhem
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Validity, discriminative ability, and reliability of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for adolescents.

Authors:  Tara Rachakonda; Donna B Jeffe; Jennifer J Shin; Leila Mankarious; Robert J Fanning; Marci M Lesperance; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Disruptive Hearing Technologies and Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss II: Current Research on Affordable Hearing Technologies and Direct-to-Consumer Models.

Authors:  Anna Marie Jilla; Carole E Johnson; Jeffrey L Danhauer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-06-15

Review 5.  Benefits from, Satisfaction with, and Self-Efficacy for Advanced Digital Hearing Aids in Users with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Carole E Johnson; Anna Marie Jilla; Jeffrey L Danhauer; J Connor Sullivan; Kristin R Sanchez
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices: Capabilities, Costs, and Cosmetics.

Authors:  Ibrahim Almufarrij; Kevin J Munro; Piers Dawes; Michael A Stone; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Device abandonment in deafblindness: a scoping review of the intersection of functionality and usability through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health lens.

Authors:  Walter Wittich; Sarah Granberg; Moa Wahlqvist; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Elina Mäki-Torkko
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.