PURPOSE: Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf), which is important in melanocyte development and melanoma growth, was assessed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay to investigate its expression as a marker for circulating melanoma cells in blood and determine the correlation with disease stage and survival in melanoma patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In optimization studies for Mitf, we tested 15 melanoma cell lines, 41 peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy volunteers, and 21 metastatic melanoma tissues. Blood specimens were procured from 90 patients with stage I (n = 20), stage II (n = 20), stage III (n = 28), and stage IV (n = 22) melanoma. Blood specimens were also obtained at four bleed intervals from 58 patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial of biochemotherapy before and after surgical treatment of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma. RESULTS: Under the optimized conditions, Mitf was negative in healthy peripheral blood lymphocytes and positive in all melanoma cell lines and 18 (86%) melanoma tissues. In the 90 patients, the rate of Mitf detection was higher with increasing American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (P < 0.0001). In the 58 patients treated with biochemotherapy and surgery, Mitf detection decreased with treatment (P = 0.019). Mitf detection after treatment was associated with a significantly lower relapse-free (P < 0.0001) and overall (P = 0.001) survival and was a significant independent prognostic factor for relapse-free (risk ratio, 5.63; P = 0.0004) and overall (risk ratio, 5.36; P = 0.005) survival. CONCLUSIONS: Mitf detection in blood can indicate subclinical metastatic disease and predict treatment outcome in melanoma patients.
PURPOSE:Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf), which is important in melanocyte development and melanoma growth, was assessed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay to investigate its expression as a marker for circulating melanoma cells in blood and determine the correlation with disease stage and survival in melanomapatients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In optimization studies for Mitf, we tested 15 melanoma cell lines, 41 peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy volunteers, and 21 metastatic melanoma tissues. Blood specimens were procured from 90 patients with stage I (n = 20), stage II (n = 20), stage III (n = 28), and stage IV (n = 22) melanoma. Blood specimens were also obtained at four bleed intervals from 58 patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial of biochemotherapy before and after surgical treatment of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma. RESULTS: Under the optimized conditions, Mitf was negative in healthy peripheral blood lymphocytes and positive in all melanoma cell lines and 18 (86%) melanoma tissues. In the 90 patients, the rate of Mitf detection was higher with increasing American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (P < 0.0001). In the 58 patients treated with biochemotherapy and surgery, Mitf detection decreased with treatment (P = 0.019). Mitf detection after treatment was associated with a significantly lower relapse-free (P < 0.0001) and overall (P = 0.001) survival and was a significant independent prognostic factor for relapse-free (risk ratio, 5.63; P = 0.0004) and overall (risk ratio, 5.36; P = 0.005) survival. CONCLUSIONS:Mitf detection in blood can indicate subclinical metastatic disease and predict treatment outcome in melanomapatients.
Authors: Edgar Selzer; Volker Wacheck; Trevor Lucas; Elisabeth Heere-Ress; Min Wu; Katherine N Weilbaecher; Werner Schlegel; Peter Valent; Fritz Wrba; Hubert Pehamberger; David Fisher; Burkhard Jansen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Gaël G McGill; Martin Horstmann; Hans R Widlund; Jinyan Du; Gabriela Motyckova; Emi K Nishimura; Yi-Ling Lin; Sridhar Ramaswamy; William Avery; Han-Fei Ding; Siobhán A Jordan; Ian J Jackson; Stanley J Korsmeyer; Todd R Golub; David E Fisher Journal: Cell Date: 2002-06-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Aliki Stathopoulou; Anna Gizi; Maria Perraki; Stella Apostolaki; Nikos Malamos; Dimitris Mavroudis; Vassilis Georgoulias; Evi S Lianidou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shanique R Palmer; Lori A Erickson; Ilia Ichetovkin; Daniel J Knauer; Svetomir N Markovic Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Kazuo Koyanagi; Steven J O'Day; Peter Boasberg; Michael B Atkins; He-Jing Wang; Rene Gonzalez; Karl Lewis; John A Thompson; Clay M Anderson; Jose Lutzky; Thomas T Amatruda; Evan Hersh; Jon Richards; Jeffrey S Weber; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Minoru Kitago; Kazuo Koyanagi; Takeshi Nakamura; Yasufumi Goto; Mark Faries; Steven J O'Day; Donald L Morton; Soldano Ferrone; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Stuart J Gallagher; John F Thompson; James Indsto; Lyndee L Scurr; Margaret Lett; Bo-Fu Gao; Ruth Dunleavey; Graham J Mann; Richard F Kefford; Helen Rizos Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Narasimhan Kothandaraman; Vladimir B Bajic; Pang N K Brendan; Chan Y Huak; Peh B Keow; Khalil Razvi; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Mahesh Choolani Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Yasufumi Goto; Soldano Ferrone; Takaaki Arigami; Minoru Kitago; Atsushi Tanemura; Eiji Sunami; Sandy L Nguyen; Roderick R Turner; Donald L Morton; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531