PURPOSE: Detection of micrometastasis in melanoma-draining lymph nodes is important for staging and prognosis. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) using S-100p-HMB-45-, and MART-1-specific antibodies is used for detecting metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). However, improvement in IHC is needed for melanoma micrometastasis detection. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paraffin-embedded archival tissue (PEAT) specimens were obtained from 42 non-SLN macrometastases, 42 SLN metastases, and 16 tumor-negative SLNs of 100 melanoma patients who underwent SLN biopsy. PEAT specimens were assessed by IHC with high molecular weight-melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA)-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and with S-100p-, HMB-45-, and MART-1-specific antibodies. Quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR assay was used for HMW-MAA and MART-1 mRNA detection. RESULTS: Expression frequency and immunostaining intensity were higher for HMW-MAA than MART-1 in nodal macrometastases (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and micrometastases (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.004, respectively). All 52 (100%) macrometastases were positive with HMW-MAA-specific mAbs, whereas 43 (83%) were positive with MART-1-specific mAbs. In a comparison analysis, 23 of 23 (100%) micrometastases were HMW-MAA-positive, whereas 21 (91%) and 18 (78%) specimens were S-100p- and HMB-45-positive, respectively. Quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR analysis of 48 nodal metastases showed HMW-MAA mRNA detection in SLNs with metastases. CONCLUSIONS: HMW-MAA is more sensitive and specific than MART-1, S-100p, and HMB-45 for IHC-based detection of SLN micrometastases. SLN PEAT-based detection specificity of melanoma micrometastases can be improved by IHC with HMW-MAA-specific mAbs.
PURPOSE: Detection of micrometastasis in melanoma-draining lymph nodes is important for staging and prognosis. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) using S-100p-HMB-45-, and MART-1-specific antibodies is used for detecting metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). However, improvement in IHC is needed for melanoma micrometastasis detection. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Paraffin-embedded archival tissue (PEAT) specimens were obtained from 42 non-SLN macrometastases, 42 SLN metastases, and 16 tumor-negative SLNs of 100 melanomapatients who underwent SLN biopsy. PEAT specimens were assessed by IHC with high molecular weight-melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA)-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and with S-100p-, HMB-45-, and MART-1-specific antibodies. Quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR assay was used for HMW-MAA and MART-1 mRNA detection. RESULTS: Expression frequency and immunostaining intensity were higher for HMW-MAA than MART-1 in nodal macrometastases (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and micrometastases (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.004, respectively). All 52 (100%) macrometastases were positive with HMW-MAA-specific mAbs, whereas 43 (83%) were positive with MART-1-specific mAbs. In a comparison analysis, 23 of 23 (100%) micrometastases were HMW-MAA-positive, whereas 21 (91%) and 18 (78%) specimens were S-100p- and HMB-45-positive, respectively. Quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR analysis of 48 nodal metastases showed HMW-MAA mRNA detection in SLNs with metastases. CONCLUSIONS:HMW-MAA is more sensitive and specific than MART-1, S-100p, and HMB-45 for IHC-based detection of SLN micrometastases. SLN PEAT-based detection specificity of melanoma micrometastases can be improved by IHC with HMW-MAA-specific mAbs.
Authors: Darius J Karimipour; Lori Lowe; Lyndon Su; Ted Hamilton; Vernon Sondak; Timothy M Johnson; Douglas Fullen Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; Edwin C Glass; He-Jing Wang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hiroya Takeuchi; Donald L Morton; Christine Kuo; Roderick R Turner; David Elashoff; Robert Elashoff; Bret Taback; Akihide Fujimoto; Dave S B Hoon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stanley P L Leong; Martin C Mihm; George F Murphy; Dave S B Hoon; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Jonathan S Zager; Axel Hauschild; Vernon K Sondak; Valerie Guild; John M Kirkwood Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Tung Nguyen; Christine Kuo; Michael B Nicholl; Myung-Shin Sim; Roderick R Turner; Donald L Morton; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Minoru Kitago; Kazuo Koyanagi; Takeshi Nakamura; Yasufumi Goto; Mark Faries; Steven J O'Day; Donald L Morton; Soldano Ferrone; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Yasufumi Goto; Takaaki Arigami; Rajmohan Murali; Richard A Scolyer; Atsushi Tanemura; Minoru Takata; Roderick R Turner; Linhda Nguyen; Tung Nguyen; Donald L Morton; Soldano Ferone; Dave S B Hoon Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.693