Literature DB >> 16488831

An evaluation of a mass media campaign to encourage parents of adolescents to talk to their children about sex.

Robert H DuRant1, Mark Wolfson, Betty LaFrance, Rajesh Balkrishnan, David Altman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated a mass media campaign in North Carolina that used television (TV) public service announcements (PSAs), radio PSAs, and billboards to encourage parents of adolescents to talk to their children about sex. The primary message of the campaign was "Talk to your kids about sex. Everyone else is."
METHODS: Thirty-two of the 100 counties in North Carolina were chosen to evaluate the mass media campaign. Paid TV PSAs were aired in 22 of these counties, radio PSAs were aired in 21 counties, and billboards were displayed in 6 counties over a period of 9 months. The counties in our sample varied from no exposure to exposure to all 3 types of media. To assess the impact of the campaign, a sample of 1,132 parents of adolescents living in the 32 counties was administered a postexposure survey via a telephone interview. Questions about exposure to the media campaign were embedded among questions concerning media exposure to other health-related messages. The parent survey assessed the frequency the parents reported exposure to each type of media message, correct knowledge of the message, and multiple item scales that assessed how often they had talked to their child about various issues related to sex during the previous 6 months, intentions to talk to their child about these issues during the next month, and attitudes about discussing sexual issues with their child.
RESULTS: In bivariate analyses the levels of parental exposure to the 3 types of media messages were associated with both having talked to their children and intentions to talk to their children about sex (p < .0001). When analyzed with multiple regression, female gender, minority ethnicity, frequency of seeing a billboard on teenage pregnancy, frequency of seeing a TV PSA about sex, and frequency of hearing a radio PSA about sex and teenage pregnancy accounted for 12.8% (p < .0001) of the variance in having talked to their child about sex. Female gender, minority ethnicity, and previously talking to their child about sex accounted for 9.9% of the variation in positive communication attitudes about sex. Positive communication attitudes, female parent, minority ethnicity, frequency of seeing a billboard about sex, frequency of seeing a TV PSA about sex, and frequency of hearing radio PSAs about sex accounted for 12.3% of the variation in parental intentions to talk to their child about sex during the next month.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to each component of this mass media campaign was associated with parents recently having talked to their adolescent children about sex and intentions to talk to their children during the next month.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488831     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.11.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  5 in total

Review 1.  Parent-based adolescent sexual health interventions and effect on communication outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Diane Santa Maria; Christine Markham; Shirley Bluethmann; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-01-30

2.  "Racism still exists": a public health intervention using racism "countermarketing" outdoor advertising in a Black neighborhood.

Authors:  Naa Oyo A Kwate
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Sharing Tobacco and E-Cigarette Information: Predicting its Occurrence and Valence among Youth and Young Adults.

Authors:  Michelle Jeong
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 4.  Community Education for Family Planning in the U.S.: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marion W Carter; Michelle L Tregear; Susan B Moskosky
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Community Education and Engagement in Family Planning: Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Brittni N Frederiksen; Nikita M Malcolm; Julia M Rollison; Marion W Carter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.