Literature DB >> 16488210

Mammotome biopsy: impact on preoperative diagnosis rate.

M S Dhillon1, S A Bradley, D W England.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the impact of mammotome biopsy on preoperative diagnosis rate.
METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken to examine the referral patterns, radiological abnormalities, sensitivity, specificity and outcome of the first 150 patients undergoing mammotome biopsy at our institution. Most of the referrals were from the NHS Breast Screening Programme (85/100).
RESULTS: The commonest radiological abnormality was microcalcification (87%). The accuracy of this biopsy technique for the target lesion was over 99%. Post-biopsy, 11 patients needed to proceed to a diagnostic surgical biopsy (7%). Forty-two malignancies were identified at final histology; 41 were diagnosed preoperatively. The positive predictive of mammotome biopsy was 98% for the present study. The present results for mammotome biopsy with regard to predicting invasion were: sensitivity 71.4% (10/14); specificity 100% (0/0); positive predictive value 100% (10/10); and negative predictive value 87% (27/31).
CONCLUSION: Prone mammotome biopsy has proven to be highly accurate, considerably improving the preoperative diagnosis within our unit, and obviating the majority of diagnostic excision biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488210     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: analysis of 602 biopsies performed over 5 years.

Authors:  A Luparia; M Durando; P Campanino; E Regini; D Lucarelli; A Talenti; G Mattone; G Mariscotti; A Sapino; G Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Mammotome(®) and EnCor (®): comparison of two systems for stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy in the characterisation of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications alone.

Authors:  Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Mattia Robella; Francesca Angelino; Elisa Regini; Pier Paolo Campanino; Marco Belletti; Silvia Osano; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.

Authors:  M Tonegutti; V Girardi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Non-operative breast pathology.

Authors:  Sarah E Pinder; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Psychiatric disorder associated with vacuum-assisted breast biopsy clip placement: a case report.

Authors:  George C Zografos; Flora Zagouri; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Marios Panou; Dimitrios Dardamanis; Georgia Giannakopoulou; George M Filippakis; George Papadimitriou; Sophia Stamouli
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2008-10-17

6.  Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in solid lesions - a blind study.

Authors:  George C Zografos; Flora Zagouri; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Dimitra Koulocheri; Afroditi Nonni; Vassiliki Oikonomou; Philip Domeyer; Maria Kotsani; Constantine Fotiadis; John Bramis
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in close proximity to the skin: a case report.

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Dimitra Koulocheri; Georgia Giannakopoulou; Aphrodite Nonni; Dimitrios Dardamanis; Nikolaos V Michalopoulos; Ioannis Flessas; John Bramis; George C Zografos
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2008-05-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.