Literature DB >> 16487808

A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.

Luciana Asprino1, Simonides Consani, Márcio de Moraes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the resistance of 3 plating rigid internal fixation techniques for mandibular condylar process fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic hemi-mandible replicas made in polyurethane were used to evaluate a control, and 3 mandibular condyle plating techniques using 2-mm system plates and screws. The plating techniques were fixation with a 4-hole plate and 4 6-mm screws, fixation with a 4-hole plate and 4 8-mm screws and fixation with 2 4-hole plates with 4 6-mm screws each. Each group was subjected to linear loading in medial to lateral and anterior to posterior directions by an Instron 4411 servohydraulic mechanical testing unit (Instron Corp, Norwood, MA). Load peak value and peak displacement were measured. Means and standard derivations were derived and compared for statistical significance using an analyses variance (P < .05) and compared by Tukey test.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were noted between fixation groups for the different mechanical measures evaluated under the different directions of linear loading. The 2-plate fixation system presented better behavior, followed by 1 plate with 4 8-mm screws and 1 plate with 4 6-mm screws. The fixation systems used were more resistant to antero-posterior load and the use of 8-mm screws improved the resistance of the fixation when compared with 6-mm screws only in the antero-posterior test.
CONCLUSION: Under the conditions tested the 2-plate fixation system provided the most favorable mechanical behavior. We can suggest that lengthy screws, with bicortical engagement, can increase the stability at fixation of mandibular condylar process fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16487808     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  16 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of patient-specific condyle fracture plates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Peter Aquilina; William C H Parr; Uphar Chamoli; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Three 1.5-mm Plate and Screw Configurations and a Single 2.0-mm Plate for Internal Fixation of a Mandibular Condylar Fracture.

Authors:  Peter Aquilina; William C H Parr; Uphar Chamoli; Stephen Wroe; Philip Clausen
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-04-18

3.  Evaluation of mechanical resistance after fixation of mandibular condylar fracture with single and double miniplates: a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Kapil Kurtadikar; Nikhil Singhvi; Jayaprasad N Shetty; Omkar Shetye; Mueedul Islam; Hari Keerthy
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  [Causation, therapy and complications of treating mandibular fractures - a retrospective analysis of 10 years].

Authors:  R Depprich; J Handschel; J Hornung; U Meyer; N R Kübler
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-01

5.  Complications of the Transmasseteric Anteroparotid Approach for Subcondylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jared Gilliland; Fabio Ritto; Paul Tiwana
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-05-11

6.  Influence of the design in sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the mechanical behavior.

Authors:  Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Márcio de Moraes; José Ricardo Albergaría-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Sanjay Rastogi; Mahendra Parvath Reddy; Azeez Gaurav Swarup; Divya Swarup; Rupshikha Choudhury
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-09-21

8.  Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Kolli Yada Giri; Puneet Sahu; Sanjay Rastogi; Ramakant Dandriyal; Sunil Mall; Aishwarya Pratap Singh; Niranjana Prasad Indra B; Himanshu Pratap Singh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  Comparison of the Stability of Mandibular Sagittal Osteotomy Fixation between Two Types of Titanium Miniplates: A Biomechanical Study in Sheep Mandibles.

Authors:  Guilherme Dos Santos Trento; Felipe Andrade Pires; Fábio André Dos Santos; Delson João da Costa; Nelson Luis Barbosa Rebellato; Leandro Eduardo Klüppel
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-18

10.  Resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures.

Authors:  Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Guilherme Spagnol; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Márcio de Moraes; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.