BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Objectives were to develop a frailty index (FI) based on a standard comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) derived from a clinical examination; to assess the validity of the FI-CGA and to compare its precision with other frailty measures. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, with five-year follow-up data. SETTING: Second phase of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA-2); clinical examinations were performed in clinics, nursing homes, and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: People selected (as either cognitively impaired cases or unimpaired controls) to receive the CSHA-2 clinical examination (n = 2305; women = 1431). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and performance-based measures and diagnostic data were extracted to correspond to the 10 impairment domains and the single comorbidity domain of a CGA. The proportion of deficits accumulated in each domain was calculated to yield the FI-CGA. The FI-CGA was validated and its predictive ability compared with other frailty measures. RESULTS: Within the seven grades of fitness/frailty identified, subjects with greater frailty were older, less educated, and more likely to be women. The FI-CGA correlated highly with a previously validated, empirically-derived frailty index (r = 0.76). Frailty was associated with higher risk of death (for each increment in frailty, the hazard ratio, adjusted for age, sex and education, was 1.23 (95% CI 1.18-1.29) and institutionalization (HR 1.20; 1.10-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: In a population survey, the FI-CGA is a valid means of quantifying frailty from routinely collected data.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Objectives were to develop a frailty index (FI) based on a standard comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) derived from a clinical examination; to assess the validity of the FI-CGA and to compare its precision with other frailty measures. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, with five-year follow-up data. SETTING: Second phase of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA-2); clinical examinations were performed in clinics, nursing homes, and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: People selected (as either cognitively impaired cases or unimpaired controls) to receive the CSHA-2 clinical examination (n = 2305; women = 1431). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and performance-based measures and diagnostic data were extracted to correspond to the 10 impairment domains and the single comorbidity domain of a CGA. The proportion of deficits accumulated in each domain was calculated to yield the FI-CGA. The FI-CGA was validated and its predictive ability compared with other frailty measures. RESULTS: Within the seven grades of fitness/frailty identified, subjects with greater frailty were older, less educated, and more likely to be women. The FI-CGA correlated highly with a previously validated, empirically-derived frailty index (r = 0.76). Frailty was associated with higher risk of death (for each increment in frailty, the hazard ratio, adjusted for age, sex and education, was 1.23 (95% CI 1.18-1.29) and institutionalization (HR 1.20; 1.10-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: In a population survey, the FI-CGA is a valid means of quantifying frailty from routinely collected data.
Authors: F Panza; V Solfrizzi; V Frisardi; S Maggi; D Sancarlo; F Adante; G D'Onofrio; D Seripa; A Pilotto Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Alberto Pilotto; Luigi Ferrucci; Marilisa Franceschi; Luigi P D'Ambrosio; Carlo Scarcelli; Leandro Cascavilla; Francesco Paris; Giuliana Placentino; Davide Seripa; Bruno Dallapiccola; Gioacchino Leandro Journal: Rejuvenation Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.663
Authors: Rebecca S Crow; Matthew C Lohman; Alexander J Titus; Martha L Bruce; Todd A Mackenzie; Stephen J Bartels; John A Batsis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kristine M Erlandson; Jennifer A Schrack; Catherine M Jankowski; Todd T Brown; Thomas B Campbell Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.071