Literature DB >> 16484153

DNA DSB induced in human cells by charged particles and gamma rays: experimental results and theoretical approaches.

A Campa1, F Ballarini, M Belli, R Cherubini, V Dini, G Esposito, W Friedland, S Gerardi, S Molinelli, A Ottolenghi, H Paretzke, G Simone, M A Tabocchini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the role played by radiation track structure and background fragments in modulating DNA fragmentation in human cells exposed to gamma-rays and light ions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human fibroblasts were exposed in vitro to different doses (in the range from 40 - 200 Gy) of (60)Co gamma-rays and 0.84 MeV protons (Linear Energy Transfer, LET, in tissue 28.5 keV/microm). The resulting DNA fragments were scored under two electrophoretic conditions, in order to optimize separation in the size ranges 0.023 - 1.0 Mbp and 1.0 - 5.7 Mbp. In parallel, DNA fragmentation was simulated both with a phenomenological approach based on the "generalized broken-stick" model, and with a mechanistic approach based on the PARTRAC (acronym of PARticle TRACk) Monte Carlo code (1.32 MeV photons were used for the simulation of (60)Co gamma-rays).
RESULTS: For both gamma-rays and protons, the experimental dose response in the range 0.023 - 5.7 Mbp could be approximated as a straight line, the slope of which provided a yield of (5.3 +/- 0.4) x 10(-9) Gy(-1) bp(-1) for gamma-rays and (7.1 +/- 0.6) x 10(-9) Gy(-1) bp(-1) for protons, leading to a Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) of 1.3 +/- 0.2. From both theoretical analyses it appeared that, while gamma-ray data were consistent with double-strand breaks (DSB) random induction, protons at low doses showed significant deviation from randomness, implying enhanced production of small fragments in the low molecular weight part of the experimental range. The theoretical analysis of fragment production was then extended to ranges where data were not available, i.e. to fragments larger than 5.7 Mbp and smaller than 23 kbp. The main outcome was that small fragments (<23 kbp) are produced almost exclusively via non-random processes, since their number is considerably higher than that produced by a random insertion of DSB. Furthermore, for protons the number of these small fragments is a significant fraction (about 20%) of the total number of fragments; these fragments remain undetected in these experiments. Calculations for 3.3 MeV alpha particle irradiation (for which no experimental data were available) were performed to further investigate the role of fragments smaller than 23 kbp; in this case, besides the non-random character of their production, their number resulted to be at least as much as half of the total number of fragments.
CONCLUSION: Comparison between experimental data and two different theoretical approaches provided further support to the hypothesis of an important role of track structure in modulating DNA damage. According to the theoretical approaches, non-randomness of fragment production was found for proton irradiation for the smaller fragments in the experimental size range and, in a significantly larger extent, for fragments of size less than 23 kbp, both for protons and alpha particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16484153     DOI: 10.1080/09553000500530888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  17 in total

Review 1.  Clustered DNA lesion repair in eukaryotes: relevance to mutagenesis and cell survival.

Authors:  Evelyne Sage; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Health risks of space exploration: targeted and nontargeted oxidative injury by high-charge and high-energy particles.

Authors:  Min Li; Géraldine Gonon; Manuela Buonanno; Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Radiation-generated short DNA fragments may perturb non-homologous end-joining and induce genomic instability.

Authors:  Dalong Pang; Thomas A Winters; Mira Jung; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; Luciane R Cavalli; Sergey Chasovkikh; Bassem R Haddad; Anatoly Dritschilo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  The BIANCA model/code of radiation-induced cell death: application to human cells exposed to different radiation types.

Authors:  Francesca Ballarini; Saverio Altieri; Silva Bortolussi; Mario Carante; Elio Giroletti; Nicoletta Protti
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  A parameter sensitivity study for simulating DNA damage after proton irradiation using TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhu; Aimee L McNamara; Jose Ramos-Mendez; Stephen J McMahon; Nicholas T Henthorn; Bruce Faddegon; Kathryn D Held; Joseph Perl; Junli Li; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury.

Authors:  Edouard I Azzam; Jean-Paul Jay-Gerin; Debkumar Pain
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Combining Heavy-Ion Therapy with Immunotherapy: An Update on Recent Developments.

Authors:  Alexander Helm; Daniel K Ebner; Walter Tinganelli; Palma Simoniello; Alessandra Bisio; Valentina Marchesano; Marco Durante; Shigeru Yamada; Takashi Shimokawa
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Cellular Response to Proton Irradiation: A Simulation Study with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhu; Aimee L McNamara; Stephen J McMahon; Jose Ramos-Mendez; Nicholas T Henthorn; Bruce Faddegon; Kathryn D Held; Joseph Perl; Junli Li; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Estimated yield of double-strand breaks from internal exposure to tritium.

Authors:  Jing Chen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Role of isolated and clustered DNA damage and the post-irradiating repair process in the effects of heavy ion beam irradiation.

Authors:  Yuka Tokuyama; Yoshiya Furusawa; Hiroshi Ide; Akira Yasui; Hiroaki Terato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.