Literature DB >> 16482977

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: personal experience.

L Muscatello1, M Giudice, G Spriano, L Tondini.   

Abstract

Data are reported on a series of 52 endoscopic procedures of dacryocystorhinostomy, performed in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Hospital of Varese, between May 1999 and February 2003. The study population comprised 42 patients (32 female, 10 male. mean age 57 and 51 years, respectively) with naso-lacrimal obstruction. In all cases, pre-operative diagnosis consisted in irrigation of the lacrimal pathways, confirmed on dacryocystography; in selected cases, an additional computed tomography examination was carried out. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia and surgical times were recorded; mean time for primary dacryocystorhinostomy was 30 minutes. A silicone tube was inserted in all patients for a period of 3 months. The procedure was successful in 81% of primary dacryocystorhinostomy cases and in 75% of revision dacryocystorhinostomy cases. Personal clinical and surgical experience, focusing on surgical techniques used in dacryocystorhinostomy, is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16482977      PMCID: PMC2639884     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  42 in total

1.  [Intubation granulomas of the lacrimal ducts in patients with silicone implants].

Authors:  V G Beloglazov; E L At'kova; L V Malaeva; G M Nikol'skaia; A B Azibekian; N M Saad El'din
Journal:  Vestn Oftalmol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

2.  [Dacryocystography using CT and MRI. Comparative study apropos of 13 clinical cases].

Authors:  P Helies; G Cosnard; C Pharaboz; M Maille; J F Maurin
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 0.818

3.  Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, technique and results.

Authors:  P Eloy; B Bertrand; M Martinez; M Hoebeke; J B Watelet; J Jamart
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  [Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy].

Authors:  L Presutti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  [Preoperative dacryocystography in patients with epiphora].

Authors:  M H Hansen; J L Albertsen; H J Nepper-Rasmussen; P S Hecht
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1996-09-02

6.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results.

Authors:  M B Sprekelsen; M T Barberán
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  The effect of silicone intubation on failure and infection rates after dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  M J Walland; G E Rose
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  Normal anatomy and lesions of the lacrimal sac and duct: evaluated by dacryocystography, computed tomography, and MR imaging.

Authors:  A L Weber; A Rodriguez-DeVelasquez; M J Lucarelli; H M Cheng
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients.

Authors:  M Weidenbecher; W Hosemann; W Buhr
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  J Hartikainen; J Antila; M Varpula; P Puukka; H Seppä; R Grénman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  10 in total

1.  Endoscopic DCR without stents: clinical guidelines and procedure.

Authors:  Basil M N Saeed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Preliminary experience with exoscope in lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  Francesca Pirola; Giuseppe Spriano; Luca Malvezzi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Endoscopic DCR: A 10 Years Personal Experience.

Authors:  Basil Mohammednather Saeed
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-23

4.  Prognostic factors for outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Shiu Ting Mak; Ida Yu-fong Io; Albert Chak-ming Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Matteo Trimarchi; A Giordano Resti; C Bellini; M Forti; M Bussi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Endoscopic versus external approach dacryocystorhinostomy: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Rinki Saha; Anuradha Sinha; Jyoti Prakash Phukan
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2013-05

Review 7.  External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: has the current view changed?

Authors:  G Savino; R Battendieri; S Traina; G Corbo; G D'Amico; M Gari; E Scarano; G Paludetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Outcome and Complications of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy without Stenting.

Authors:  Muhammad Ayoob; Khalid Mahida; Qurat Ul-Ain; Zafar Dawood
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Transnasal endoscopic assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Răzvan Hainăroșie; Irina Ioniță; Cătălina Pietroșanu; Silviu Pițuru; Mura Hainăroșie; Viorel Zainea
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Comparison of Application of Mitomycin C Vs Silicon Stenting Vs Conventional Method in Endonasal Dacrocystorhinostomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of 150 Patients.

Authors:  Shrinivas-Shripatrao Chavan; Vitthal D Kale; Karthik N Rao; Devkumar Rengaraja; Amol Hekare
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.