Literature DB >> 19499237

Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Matteo Trimarchi1, A Giordano Resti, C Bellini, M Forti, M Bussi.   

Abstract

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established alternative to external approaches in the treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstruction. From July 2004 to December 2008, 92 endoscopic DCRs were performed on 88 patients at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. All patients were affected by chronic dacryocystitis with epiphora. Preoperative work-up included Jones tests, lacrimal pathways irrigation, nasal endoscopy, and imaging evaluation by computed tomography. The technique involved anastomosis of nasal mucosal, lacrimal sac flaps and a large bony ostium. A silicone tube was inserted in all patients that remained for a period of 3 months. The first endoscopic intervention was successful in 91.30% of patients. After a second revision endoscopic DCR, the overall success rate raised to 95.65%. Anastomosis of nasal mucosal between lacrimal sac flaps plays a key role in endoscopic DCR with a high success rate both in primary nasolacrimal obstructions and in revision cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499237     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1002-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Topical application of mitomycin-C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Y K Selig; B S Biesman; E E Rebeiz
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes).

Authors:  Y Cokkeser; C Evereklioglu; H Er
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Revision dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparison of endoscopic and external techniques.

Authors:  Angelo Tsirbas; Garry Davis; Peter J Wormald
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2005 May-Jun

4.  The safety and efficacy of mitomycin C in endonasal endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  J G Camara; A U Bengzon; R D Henson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.746

5.  The effect of silicone intubation on failure and infection rates after dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  M J Walland; G E Rose
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

6.  Adjunctive use of mitomycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  G Zilelioğlu; S H Uğurbaş; Y Anadolu; M Akiner; T Aktürk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Nasolacrimal obstruction secondary to I(131) therapy.

Authors:  J A Burns; K E Morgenstern; K V Cahill; J A Foster; S M Jhiang; R T Kloos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Peter J Dolman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation.

Authors:  K Allen; A J Berlin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1989-07

10.  [Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, technique and results].

Authors:  I Pár; I Pliskvová; J Plch
Journal:  Cesk Slov Oftalmol       Date:  1998-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  Double Posterior Based Flap Technique in Primary Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With and Without Using Powered Instrument.

Authors:  Pradeep Pradhan; Abhishek Bhardwaj; Santanu Mandal; Sudhir Majhi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-10

2.  New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians.

Authors:  Qing-Shan Ji; Jing-Xiang Zhong; Yun-Hai Tu; Wen-Can Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis.

Authors:  W Wu; P S Cannon; W Yan; Y Tu; D Selva; J Qu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Prognostic factors for outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Shiu Ting Mak; Ida Yu-fong Io; Albert Chak-ming Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: outcomes using mucosal flap preserving technique.

Authors:  Ibrahim Çukurova; Gül Caner Mercan; Erdem Çetinkaya; Murat Gümüsssoy; Hakan Söken
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparison of balloon dacryocystorhinostomy with conventional endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for relief of acquired distal nasolacrimal drainage obstruction and its impact on quality of life: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Awadhesh Kumar Mishra; Ajith Nilakantan; Sanjay Mishra; Ajay Mallick
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-10-29

7.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with an otologic T-type ventilation tube in repeated revision cases.

Authors:  Sihai Wu; Ting Xu; Bin Fan; Dajiang Xiao
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  A Modified Preserved Nasal and Lacrimal Flap Technique in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Wenyan Peng; Bowei Tan; Yandong Wang; Haiying Wang; Zhonghao Wang; Xuanwei Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Long-term results of a balloon-assisted endoscopic approach in failed dacryocystorhinostomies.

Authors:  Alessandro Vinciguerra; Matteo Trimarchi; Pietro Indelicato; Antonio Giordano Resti; Mario Bussi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.236

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.