Literature DB >> 16481147

New methodology for viability testing in environmental samples.

J P Biggerstaff1, M Le Puil, B L Weidow, J Prater, K Glass, M Radosevich, D C White.   

Abstract

Environmental samples can be complex and are comprised of microorganisms and a matrix of decaying organic matter as well as an inorganic phase such as sand or precipitated material (waste water, sludge, soils, etc.). Nucleic acid dyes have recently been developed to address the growing need for environmental analyses (cell staining, counting, viability testing and specific organism identification). However, certain dyes may not be ideally suited for testing of environmental samples, because they readily adhere to the substrate material as well as their target molecule, resulting in increased non-specific binding and background fluorescence. The aim of this study was to address the limitations of the widely used and commercially available Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). A new combination of nucleic acid dyes, i.e. SYTO13 and SYTOX Orange (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), was proposed as an alternative. The dyes were carefully chosen for their spectral separation and increase of fluorescence quantum yield. A protocol for this combination was first designed and optimized and the two staining assays were compared against suspensions of live and dead E. coli, mixed in different proportions and it was shown that both protocols performed equally on pure cultures. However, when testing activated sludge samples, the commercial kit showed greater background fluorescence and non-specific binding than the alternate combination. Therefore, the proposed dye combination and its corresponding protocol are deemed more suitable for use on complex environmental samples than the Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability kit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481147     DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2005.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Probes        ISSN: 0890-8508            Impact factor:   2.365


  16 in total

Review 1.  Selected fluorescent techniques for identification of the physiological state of individual water and soil bacterial cells - review.

Authors:  S Lew; M Lew; T Mieszczyński; J Szarek
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Penetration kinetics of four mouthrinses into Streptococcus mutans biofilms analyzed by direct time-lapse visualization.

Authors:  Rika Wakamatsu; Shoji Takenaka; Tatsuya Ohsumi; Yutaka Terao; Hayato Ohshima; Takashi Okiji
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A 96-well-plate-based optical method for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and its application to susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Mathias Müsken; Stefano Di Fiore; Ute Römling; Susanne Häussler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Anaerobic digestion of sulphate-rich post-tanning wastewater at different COD/sulphate and F/M ratios.

Authors:  M Mahesh; K V Arivizhivendhan; K Nivetha; S Swarnalatha; G Sekaran
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity Based on a Synergistic Combination of Sublethal Levels of Stresses Induced by UV-A Light and Organic Acids.

Authors:  Erick F de Oliveira; Andrea Cossu; Rohan V Tikekar; Nitin Nitin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of antibacterial activity against Salmonella Enteritidis.

Authors:  Gaëlle Legendre; Fabienne Faÿ; Isabelle Linossier; Karine Vallée-Réhel
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Metabolic responses of Lactobacillus plantarum strains during fermentation and storage of vegetable and fruit juices.

Authors:  P Filannino; G Cardinali; C G Rizzello; S Buchin; M De Angelis; M Gobbetti; R Di Cagno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Agreement, precision, and accuracy of epifluorescence microscopy methods for enumeration of total bacterial numbers.

Authors:  Eun-Young Seo; Tae-Seok Ahn; Young-Gun Zo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluating the flow-cytometric nucleic acid double-staining protocol in realistic situations of planktonic bacterial death.

Authors:  Tania Falcioni; Stefano Papa; Josep M Gasol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Characterization of an Acinetobacter baumannii lptD Deletion Strain: Permeability Defects and Response to Inhibition of Lipopolysaccharide and Fatty Acid Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Jade Bojkovic; Daryl L Richie; David A Six; Christopher M Rath; William S Sawyer; Qijun Hu; Charles R Dean
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.