Literature DB >> 16479468

[Results of coloscopy screening in 2005--an Internet-based documentation].

A Sieg1, A Theilmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In October 2002 screening coloscopy was introduced into the National Cancer Prevention Programme in Germany. The results of an online registry are presented here.
METHODS: Data from consecutive screening colonoscopies in the practices of the 280 participating gastroenterologists, performed in asymptomatic subjects, were collected in an online registry. Number and histology of colorectal polyps and carcinomas, complication rates of colonoscopy and polypectomy were registered. Advanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma >10 mm in diameter, with villous or tubulovillous histology, or presence of high-grade dysplasia.
RESULTS: A total of 109989 colonoscopies (43% in males) were evaluated from October 2003 to July 2005. Tubular and villous adenomas were found in 16.2% and 3.8%, respectively, whereas invasive cancers were diagnosed in 0.7%. Advanced adenomas amounted to 6.1%.The majority of carcinomas were detected in early stages (UICC stages I and II in 48 and 22 %, respectively). -In most of the polyps immediate polypectomy was carried out. The complication rate was low and no deaths were observed: cardiopulmonary complications occurred in 0.10% of the colonoscopies, bleeding in 0.79% of polypectomies most of which were managed endoscopically (surgery in 0.04% of polypectomies). Perforation occurred in 0.02% of the colonoscopies and 0.10% of polypectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoplasias of the colon were detected in about 20% of persons who had taken part in a colonoscopy screening programme: most of the lesions were immediately removed by polypectomy. The high rate of early stages of colorectal cancers detected by screening colonoscopy is an indirect indicator of mortality reduction. In Germany screening colonoscopy has a low risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16479468     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-932528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  10 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; James E East; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Using the Cancer Risk Management Model to evaluate colorectal cancer screening options for Canada.

Authors:  A J Coldman; N Phillips; J Brisson; W Flanagan; M Wolfson; C Nadeau; N Fitzgerald; A B Miller
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Perspectives of colorectal cancer screening in Germany 2009.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg; Kilian Friedrich
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

4.  Eight years of colonoscopic bowel cancer screening in Germany: initial findings and projections.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Lutz Altenhofen; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Capsule endoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-16

Review 6.  CT Colonography and Colorectal Carcinoma: Current Trends and Emerging Developments.

Authors:  Monika Kadari; Muhammad Subhan; Nisha Saji Parel; Parimi Vamsi Krishna; Anuradha Gupta; Kamsika Uthayaseelan; Kivonika Uthayaseelan; Naga Anjani Bhaskar Srinivas Sunkara
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-11

7.  Epidemiology and quality control of 245 000 outpatient colonoscopies.

Authors:  Ulrich Mansmann; Alexander Crispin; Volkmar Henschel; Christine Adrion; Volker Augustin; Berndt Birkner; Axel Munte
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  [Examples of screening investigations].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; A Hahn; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy: a benefit-risk analysis of German surveillance recommendations.

Authors:  F Becker; G Nusko; J Welke; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Narrow-band imaging does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Luis C Sabbagh; Ludovic Reveiz; Diego Aponte; Sylvia de Aguiar
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.