BACKGROUND: Differential item functioning (DIF) exists when test item responses by members of different demographic groups are statistically different when controlling for ability. DIF may indicate item bias. Our objective was to determine whether items from the Italian Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) had DIF related to educational attainment, age, gender and occupation. We were also interested in exploring the significance of DIF in screening tests. METHODS: In a two-stage study from Granarolo, Italy, residents over age 61 (n = 495) were evaluated with the Italian MMSE. Those with MMSE scores of 28 or lower were further evaluated for dementia. MMSE results were coded in 10 item bundles. We used ordinal logistic regression to determine whether item bundles had DIF. RESULTS: Six of the 10 MMSE item bundles had DIF in educational attainment subgroups. Four of these six bundles also had DIF related to age. Items that required literacy were much harder for those with lower educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: DIF related to education appeared at as few as 3 years of formal schooling. These findings suggest cautious interpretation of data from studies using the Italian MMSE in populations with heterogeneous educational backgrounds. DIF is especially troublesome for two-stage studies that use screening tests.
BACKGROUND: Differential item functioning (DIF) exists when test item responses by members of different demographic groups are statistically different when controlling for ability. DIF may indicate item bias. Our objective was to determine whether items from the Italian Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) had DIF related to educational attainment, age, gender and occupation. We were also interested in exploring the significance of DIF in screening tests. METHODS: In a two-stage study from Granarolo, Italy, residents over age 61 (n = 495) were evaluated with the Italian MMSE. Those with MMSE scores of 28 or lower were further evaluated for dementia. MMSE results were coded in 10 item bundles. We used ordinal logistic regression to determine whether item bundles had DIF. RESULTS: Six of the 10 MMSE item bundles had DIF in educational attainment subgroups. Four of these six bundles also had DIF related to age. Items that required literacy were much harder for those with lower educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: DIF related to education appeared at as few as 3 years of formal schooling. These findings suggest cautious interpretation of data from studies using the Italian MMSE in populations with heterogeneous educational backgrounds. DIF is especially troublesome for two-stage studies that use screening tests.
Authors: Ingo Uttner; Niklas Schurig; Christine A F von Arnim; Christian Lange-Asschenfeldt; Hayrettin Tumani; Matthias W Riepe Journal: J Neurol Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Robert Fieo; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Joseph P Eimicke; Paul K Crane; David Cella; Jeanne A Teresi Journal: Psychol Test Assess Model Date: 2016
Authors: Ge Li; Eric B Larson; Jane B Shofer; Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Wayne McCormick; James D Bowen; Mary Lou Thompson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Beth E Snitz; Lan Yu; Paul K Crane; Chung-Chou H Chang; Tiffany F Hughes; Mary Ganguli Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2012 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Paul K Crane; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Laura E Gibbons; Dan M Mungas; Sebastien Haneuse; Eric B Larson; Lewis Kuller; Kathleen Hall; Gerald van Belle Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Frances M Yang; Kevin C Heslin; Kala M Mehta; Cheng-Wu Yang; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Marjorie Kleinman; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays; Anita L Stewart; Dan Mungas; Richard N Jones; Jeanne A Teresi Journal: Psychol Test Assess Model Date: 2011
Authors: Paul K Crane; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Laura E Gibbons; Otto Pedraza; Kala M Mehta; Yuxiao Tang; Jennifer J Manly; Bruce R Reed; Dan M Mungas Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.892