Literature DB >> 16478384

The effect of semantic representation on toddlers' word retrieval.

Nina C Capone1, Karla K McGregor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that depth of semantic representation influences toddlers' word retrieval.
METHOD: Nineteen toddlers participated under 3 word learning conditions in this longitudinal study. Gestures cued attention to object shape (SHP) or function (FNC) in the experimental conditions. No semantic cue was provided under a control condition (CTL). Word learning conditions occurred on each of 3 days. On the 4th day, word retrieval was assessed across 3 levels of scaffolding (uncued picture naming, cued picture naming, picture recognition). Evidence of semantic representation was provided at fast and slow mapping intervals.
RESULTS: Less scaffolding was necessary for word retrieval (uncued and cued naming) under experimental conditions than under the CTL condition. However, more SHP than FNC condition targets were retrieved for uncued picture naming. This latter difference may be related to the superior fast mapping of targets under the SHP condition. Toddlers stated object functions (slow mapping) comparably in the experimental conditions, but this was superior to CTL condition performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Word retrieval is a continuous behavior that is positively influenced by semantic representation. Semantic knowledge of objects can be enriched by shape or function gestures, thereby improving toddlers' object word productions. Shape cues appear to be more effective for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16478384     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/102)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  34 in total

1.  The First Slow Step: Differential Effects of Object and Word-Form Familiarization on Retention of Fast-Mapped Words.

Authors:  Sarah C Kucker; Larissa K Samuelson
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2011-06-09

2.  The relationship between phonological memory, phonological sensitivity, and incidental word learning.

Authors:  Vijayachandra Ramachandra; Lynne E Hewitt; Tim Brackenbury
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-04

3.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Complexities of expressive word learning over time.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Li Sheng; Tracy Ball
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Christina Meyers; Paul M Alt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Semantic richness and word learning in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Allison Gladfelter; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-05-04

7.  Learning from gesture: How early does it happen?

Authors:  Miriam A Novack; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Amanda L Woodward
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-01

8.  The Independent Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Lexical Acquisition by Preschool Children.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Su-Yeon Lee
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011

9.  Vocabulary size and auditory word recognition in preschool children.

Authors:  Franzo Law; Tristan Mahr; Alissa Schneeberg; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2016-05-11

10.  Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky; Erin Burns; Jeffrey L Elman; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.