Literature DB >> 16478333

Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Jeff Miller1, Mark Alderton.   

Abstract

Bottleneck models of psychological refractory period (PRP) tasks suggest that a Task 1 response should be unaffected by the Task 2 response in the same trial, because selection of the former finishes before selection of the latter begins. Contrary to this conception, the authors found backward response-level crosstalk effects in which Task 2 response force requirements influenced the force-time dynamics of Task 1 responses. Specifically, Task 2 required a hard or soft keypress response. Task 1 responses were harder when the upcoming Task 2 response was to press hard rather than soft, suggesting some activation of Task 2 response parameters before Task 1 processing reached the final ballistic motor output stage. A 3rd experiment using a flankers paradigm showed that this effect did not arise from automatic activation of responses by the stimuli associated with hard and soft responses. This backward response-level crosstalk extends previous findings of backward crosstalk in the PRP paradigm by showing that crosstalk can affect motor output as well as response time and can arise even when the 2 tasks being performed are not semantically related. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16478333     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Jeff Miller; Torsten Shubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

2.  Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Michel D Druey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-05-30

3.  Visuospatial attention and redundancy gain.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Daniela Beutinger; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-09

4.  Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: evidence from the backward compatibility effect.

Authors:  Ravid Ellenbogen; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

5.  Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters?

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

7.  Late backward effects in the refractory period paradigm: effects of Task 2 execution on Task 1 performance.

Authors:  Susana Ruiz Fernández; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-24

8.  PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect.

Authors:  Sandra J Thomson; Lila K Danis; Scott Watter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

9.  Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Skaiste G Kerusauskaite; Luca Simione; Antonino Raffone; Narayanan Srinivasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs.

Authors:  Aleks Pieczykolan; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.