BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate early insertion of ocular prostheses for aesthetic rehabilitation after enucleation and review current methods of enucleation surgery. METHODS: Twelve patients with large intraocular malignancies were treated by enucleation with implant. At the end of surgery, a medium-size conformer was inserted onto the closed conjunctival wound (just before applying a pressure dressing). The pressure dressing was removed 3 to 5 days after surgery. Immediately after bandage removal, the patients saw themselves in a mirror and were offered placement of a relatively small ocular prosthesis. Patients were asked if they preferred their aesthetic appearance with or without the prosthesis. RESULTS: Eight patients (67%) tolerated introduction of the prosthesis at the time of removal of their pressure dressing (3 to 5 days after enucleation surgery). Because of discomfort, 4 were able to receive their prostheses at their second postoperative visit (day 12 or 13). The manipulation at prosthesis insertion and subsequent wearing was found to have no effect on wound closure, final prosthetic fittings, or movement of the permanent prosthesis. All patients were pleased with the cosmetic benefit afforded by early introduction of the prosthesis and preferred their appearance to that of their eye with the conformer. CONCLUSIONS: Early replacement of the conformer by an ocular prosthesis allows for cosmetic rehabilitation and improved quality of life.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate early insertion of ocular prostheses for aesthetic rehabilitation after enucleation and review current methods of enucleation surgery. METHODS: Twelve patients with large intraocular malignancies were treated by enucleation with implant. At the end of surgery, a medium-size conformer was inserted onto the closed conjunctival wound (just before applying a pressure dressing). The pressure dressing was removed 3 to 5 days after surgery. Immediately after bandage removal, the patients saw themselves in a mirror and were offered placement of a relatively small ocular prosthesis. Patients were asked if they preferred their aesthetic appearance with or without the prosthesis. RESULTS: Eight patients (67%) tolerated introduction of the prosthesis at the time of removal of their pressure dressing (3 to 5 days after enucleation surgery). Because of discomfort, 4 were able to receive their prostheses at their second postoperative visit (day 12 or 13). The manipulation at prosthesis insertion and subsequent wearing was found to have no effect on wound closure, final prosthetic fittings, or movement of the permanent prosthesis. All patients were pleased with the cosmetic benefit afforded by early introduction of the prosthesis and preferred their appearance to that of their eye with the conformer. CONCLUSIONS: Early replacement of the conformer by an ocular prosthesis allows for cosmetic rehabilitation and improved quality of life.
Authors: I Avisar; J H Norris; S Quinn; D Allan; M McCalla; D Dugdale; M Parulekar; R Malhotra Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Alexander C Rokohl; Konrad R Koch; Werner Adler; Marc Trester; Wolfgang Trester; Nicola S Pine; Keith R Pine; Ludwig M Heindl Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Ludwig M Heindl; Marc Trester; Yongwei Guo; Florian Zwiener; Narges Sadat; Nicola S Pine; Keith R Pine; Andreas Traweger; Alexander C Rokohl Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 3.117