BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Restenosis is a complication of interventional procedures such as angioplasty and stenting, often limiting the success of these procedures. Knowledge regarding the relative behaviour of different arteries after these procedures is limited, despite the extensive use of different vascular models. Although the results from studies using different vessels are analysed to predict the behaviour of coronary arteries and other vasculature, direct controlled comparisons between different arteries are necessary for a better understanding of the differential response to restenosis. METHODS: This study examines the response to stenting in coronary and internal iliac arteries as characterised by intimal hyperplasia and restenosis. In a swine model of in-stent stenosis, coronary arteries exhibited higher levels of intimal hyperplasia and per cent stenosis than internal iliac arteries. RESULTS: After normalisation for injury score, coronary arteries were found to undergo 47% more intimal hyperplasia (p<0.05), whereas per cent stenosis normalised for injury score tended to be higher (p = 0.01). Other measurements reflecting post-stenting intimal hyperplasia (maximal intimal thickness, medial area) did not exhibit significant differences between the artery groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that coronary vessels are more prone to develop significant intimal hyperplasia and subsequent restenosis than internal iliac vessels. A better insight into how different arteries and arterial components behave is important in understanding and developing newer and better therapeutic measures for restenosis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Restenosis is a complication of interventional procedures such as angioplasty and stenting, often limiting the success of these procedures. Knowledge regarding the relative behaviour of different arteries after these procedures is limited, despite the extensive use of different vascular models. Although the results from studies using different vessels are analysed to predict the behaviour of coronary arteries and other vasculature, direct controlled comparisons between different arteries are necessary for a better understanding of the differential response to restenosis. METHODS: This study examines the response to stenting in coronary and internal iliac arteries as characterised by intimal hyperplasia and restenosis. In a swine model of in-stent stenosis, coronary arteries exhibited higher levels of intimal hyperplasia and per cent stenosis than internal iliac arteries. RESULTS: After normalisation for injury score, coronary arteries were found to undergo 47% more intimal hyperplasia (p<0.05), whereas per cent stenosis normalised for injury score tended to be higher (p = 0.01). Other measurements reflecting post-stenting intimal hyperplasia (maximal intimal thickness, medial area) did not exhibit significant differences between the artery groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that coronary vessels are more prone to develop significant intimal hyperplasia and subsequent restenosis than internal iliac vessels. A better insight into how different arteries and arterial components behave is important in understanding and developing newer and better therapeutic measures for restenosis.
Authors: J J Badimon; A F Ortiz; B Meyer; A Mailhac; J T Fallon; E Falk; L Badimon; J H Chesebro; V Fuster Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: R Hoffmann; G S Mintz; G R Dussaillant; J J Popma; A D Pichard; L F Satler; K M Kent; J Griffin; M B Leon Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P W Serruys; P de Jaegere; F Kiemeneij; C Macaya; W Rutsch; G Heyndrickx; H Emanuelsson; J Marco; V Legrand; P Materne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D L Fischman; M B Leon; D S Baim; R A Schatz; M P Savage; I Penn; K Detre; L Veltri; D Ricci; M Nobuyoshi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ji Won Lee; Chang Won Kim; Han Cheol Lee; Ming-Ting Wu; Lee Hwangbo; Ki Seok Choo; June Hong Kim; Ki-Nam Lee; Jin You Kim; Yeon Joo Jeong Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Gaurav K Gupta; Kajari Dhar; Michael G Del Core; William J Hunter; Georgios I Hatzoudis; Devendra K Agrawal Journal: Exp Mol Pathol Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 3.362