Literature DB >> 16472230

QSAR modeling of carcinogenic risk using discriminant analysis and topological molecular descriptors.

Joseph F Contrera1, Philip Maclaughlin, Lowell H Hall, Lemont B Kier.   

Abstract

A discriminant analysis model is presented for carcinogenic risk. The data set is obtained from the two-year rodent study FDA/CDER database and was divided into a training set of 1022 organic compounds and an external validation test set of 50 compounds. The model is designed to use as a decision support tool for a defined decision threshold, and is thus a binary discrimination into "high risk" and "low risk" categories. The carcinogenic risk classification is based on the method for estimating human risk from two-year rodent studies developed at the FDA/CDER/ICSAS. The paradigm chosen for this model allows a straightforward risk analysis based on historic information, as well as the computation of coverage, probability and confidence metrics that can further qualify the computed result. The molecular structures were represented as MDL mol files. The molecular structure information was obtained as topological structure descriptors, including atom-type and group-type E-State and hydrogen E-State indices, molecular connectivity chi indices, topological polarity, and counts of molecular features. The MDL QSAR software computed all these descriptors. Furthermore, the discriminant analyses were all performed with the MDL QSAR software. The reported model is based on fifty-three descriptors, using the nonparametric normal kernel method and the Mahalanobis distance to determine proximity. The model performed very well on the fifty compounds of the test set, yielding the following statistics: 76% correctly classified "high risk" (carcinogenic) and 84% correctly classified as "low risk" (non-carcinogenic).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16472230     DOI: 10.2174/1570163054064684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Drug Discov Technol        ISSN: 1570-1638


  8 in total

Review 1.  Computer-aided drug discovery and development (CADDD): in silico-chemico-biological approach.

Authors:  I M Kapetanovic
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.192

2.  Prediction of carcinogenicity for diverse chemicals based on substructure grouping and SVM modeling.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Tanabe; Bono Lučić; Dragan Amić; Takio Kurita; Mikio Kaihara; Natsuo Onodera; Takahiro Suzuki
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 3.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Natalja Fjodorova; Marjan Vracko; Marjana Novic; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 5.  Facilitating compound progression of antiretroviral agents via modeling and simulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Molecular connectivity indices for modeling the critical micelle concentration of cationic (chloride) Gemini surfactants.

Authors:  Anna Mozrzymas
Journal:  Colloid Polym Sci       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  QSAR study of phenolic compounds and their anti-DPPH radical activity by discriminant analysis.

Authors:  Ang Lu; Shi-Meng Yuan; Huai Xiao; Da-Song Yang; Zhi-Qiong Ai; Qi-Yan Li; Yu Zhao; Zhuang-Zhi Chen; Xiu-Mei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Additive SMILES-based carcinogenicity models: Probabilistic principles in the search for robust predictions.

Authors:  Andrey A Toropov; Alla P Toropova; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.