Literature DB >> 16470594

Automated in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI with Morphology-Enhanced probability maps.

Fei Liu1, Dongxiang Xu, Marina S Ferguson, Baocheng Chu, Tobias Saam, Norihide Takaya, Thomas S Hatsukami, Chun Yuan, William S Kerwin.   

Abstract

MRI is a promising noninvasive technique for characterizing atherosclerotic plaque composition in vivo, with an end-goal of assessing plaque vulnerability. Because of limitations arising from acquisition time, achievable resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio, patient motion, and the effects of blood flow, automatically identifying plaque composition remains a challenging task in vivo. In this article, a segmentation method using maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian theory is presented that divides axial, multi-contrast-weighted images into regions of necrotic core, calcification, loose matrix, and fibrous tissue. Key advantages of the method are that it utilizes morphologic information, such as local wall thickness, and coupled active contours to limit the impact from noise and artifacts associated with in vivo imaging. In experiments involving 142 sets of multi-contrast images from 26 subjects undergoing carotid endarterectomy, segmented areas of each of these tissues per slice agreed with histologically confirmed areas with correlations (R(2)) of 0.78, 0.83, 0.41, and 0.82, respectively. In comparison, manually identifying areas blinded to histology yielded correlations of 0.71, 0.76, 0.33, and 0.78, respectively. These results show that in vivo automatic segmentation of carotid MRI is feasible and comparable to or possibly more accurate than manual review for quantifying plaque composition. Magn Reson Med, 2006. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16470594     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  28 in total

1.  Automated versus manual in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI.

Authors:  R van 't Klooster; O Naggara; R Marsico; J H C Reiber; J-F Meder; R J van der Geest; E Touzé; C Oppenheim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Composite MRA: statistical approach to generate an MR angiogram from multiple contrasts.

Authors:  Dahan Kim; Myriam Edjlali; Patrick Turski; Kevin M Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Automated versus manual segmentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque volume and components in CTA: associations with cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Danijela Vukadinovic; Sietske Rozie; Marjon van Gils; Theo van Walsum; Rashindra Manniesing; Aad van der Lugt; Wiro J Niessen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Imaging biomarkers of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jinnan Wang; Niranjan Balu; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Semi-automatic MRI segmentation and volume quantification of intra-plaque hemorrhage.

Authors:  Hui Tang; Mariana Selwaness; Reinhard Hameeteman; Anouk van Dijk; Aad van der Lugt; Jacqueline C Witteman; Wiro J Niessen; Lucas J van Vliet; Theo van Walsum
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Reproducibility and accuracy of automated measurement for dynamic arterial lumen area by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Clare E Jackson; Cheerag C Shirodaria; Justin M S Lee; Jane M Francis; Robin P Choudhury; Keith M Channon; J Alison Noble; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Magnetic [corrected] resonance imaging [corrected] features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque.

Authors:  Baocheng Chu; Marina S Ferguson; Huijun Chen; Daniel S Hippe; William S Kerwin; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

8.  Signal features of the atherosclerotic plaque at 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla: impact on automatic classification.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Fei Liu; Vasily Yarnykh; Hunter Underhill; Minako Oikawa; Wei Yu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Atherosclerotic Plaque Tissue: Noninvasive Quantitative Assessment of Characteristics with Software-aided Measurements from Conventional CT Angiography.

Authors:  Malachi Sheahan; Xiaonan Ma; David Paik; Nancy A Obuchowski; Samantha St Pierre; William P Newman; Guenevere Rae; Eric S Perlman; Michael Rosol; James C Keith; Andrew J Buckler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in carotid atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Li Dong; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Rui Li; Jinnan Wang; Huijun Chen; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.