Literature DB >> 16470428

All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB.

Hans Hyldahl1, Lars Regnér, Lars Carlsson, Johan Kärrholm, Lars Weidenhielm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy still exists as to whether to mount the tibial bearing on a metal baseplate or not. Furthermore, the tibial component can be either horizontally or completely cemented. We evaluated metal backing versus all-polyethylene using horizontal cementing technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomized 40 patients with knee arthrosis (40 knees) to 2 groups: cemented total knee arthroplasty (AGC, Biomet) using either all-polyethylene (AP) or metal-backed (MB) tibial components (n = 20 for each group). All tibial implants had a total thickness of 8 mm. We used proximal cement-ing, including only the horizontal part of the tibia with avoidance of the stem-bone interface.
RESULTS: The positioning of the implants, as judged by the HKA angle, showed an average neutral alignment in both groups. Preoperatively and after 2 years, there was no statistically significant difference between the HSS scores in both groups (p = 0.6 and 0.4). After 2 years, the metal-backed components had rotated more around the longitudinal axis, median 0.5 degrees vs. 0.2 degrees (internal or external rotation, p = 0.002), and showed increased maximum total point motion, median 1.0 vs. 0.4 mm (maximum migration or MTPM, p = 0.003).
INTERPRETATION: Our study indicates that better fixation can be obtained with the all-polyethylene design if proximally cemented thin components are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16470428     DOI: 10.1080/17453670510045354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  13 in total

Review 1.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of cementing techniques of the tibial component in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Tuuli Saari; Ming Guo Li; David Wood; Bo Nivbrant
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Klaas Auke Nouta; Wiebe C Verra; Bart G Pijls; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Gerald Dorninger; Mark Agreiter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mauro Ciuffreda; Valerio D'Andrea; Nicholas Mannering; Joel Locher; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Edward R Valstar; Klaas-Auke Nouta; Josepha Wm Plevier; Marta Fiocco; Saskia Middeldorp; Rob Ghh Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  All-polyethylene tibial components in TKA in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Hannu T Aro; Charles Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Monoblock versus modular polyethylene insert in uncemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mikkel Rathsach Andersen; Nikolaj Winther; Thomas Lind; Henrik SchrøDer; Gunnar Flivik; Michael Mørk Petersen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.