Literature DB >> 16469297

Microdosimetry for conventional and supra-electroporation in cells with organelles.

Thiruvallur R Gowrishankar1, Axel T Esser, Zlatko Vasilkoski, Kyle C Smith, James C Weaver.   

Abstract

Conventional electroporation (EP) by 0.1 to 1 kV/cm pulses longer than 100 micros, and supra-electroporation by 10 to 300 kV/cm pulses shorter than 1 micros cause different cellular effects. Conventional EP delivers DNA, proteins, small drugs, and fluorescent indicators across the plasma membrane (PM) and causes moderate levels of phosphatidylserine (PS) translocation at the PM. We hypothesize that supra-EP is central to intracellular effects such as apoptosis induction and higher levels of PS translocation. Our cell system model has 20,000 interconnected local models for small areas of the PM and organelle membranes, small regions of aqueous media, appropriate resting potentials, and the asymptotic EP model. Conventional EP primarily affects the PM, but with a hint of endoplasmic reticulum involvement. Supra-EP can involve all of a cell's membrane at the largest fields. Conventional EP fields tend to go around cells, but supra-EP fields go through cells, extensively penetrating organelles.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16469297     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  47 in total

1.  The current-voltage relation for electropores with conductivity gradients.

Authors:  Jianbo Li; Hao Lin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Mechanisms for the intracellular manipulation of organelles by conventional electroporation.

Authors:  Axel T Esser; Kyle C Smith; T R Gowrishankar; Zlatko Vasilkoski; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Gene transfer: how can the biological barriers be overcome?

Authors:  Jean-Michel Escoffre; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell.

Authors:  Wanda Krassowska; Petar D Filev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Hybrid finite element method for describing the electrical response of biological cells to applied fields.

Authors:  Wenjun Ying; Craig S Henriquez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Transmembrane molecular transport during versus after extremely large, nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Membrane perturbation by an external electric field: a mechanism to permit molecular uptake.

Authors:  J-M Escoffre; D S Dean; M Hubert; M-P Rols; C Favard
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 1.733

8.  Lab-on-a-chip technologies for proteomic analysis from isolated cells.

Authors:  H Sedgwick; F Caron; P B Monaghan; W Kolch; J M Cooper
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Nanosecond electric pulses affect a plant-specific kinesin at the plasma membrane.

Authors:  Sebastian Kühn; Qiong Liu; Christian Eing; Wolfgang Frey; Peter Nick
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.