Literature DB >> 16469216

A prospective comparison of vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a non-superobese population.

Fotis Kalfarentzos1, George Skroubis, Ioannis Kehagias, Nancy Mead, Kostas Vagenas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the non-superobese population, consensus is currently unavailable in bariatric surgery. We report the results of a prospective comparison of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in a non-superobese population.
METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, 179 patients with clinically severe obesity underwent various surgical procedures in our department. During this time a prospective study was undertaken in order to compare VBG with RYGBP in morbidly obese patients with a BMI <50 kg/m2. Based on specific criteria including eating behavior, 68 patients were selected to undergo RYGBP and 35 VBG. All patients have undergone complete follow-up evaluation at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and every year thereafter.
RESULTS: All patients have now completed their 5th postoperative year. Mean follow-up period to date is 96.5+/-12.2 months for VBG and 67.6+/-11.3 months for RYGBP. 3 patients (8.6%) in the VBG group and 9 patients (13.2%) in the RYGBP group are lost to follow-up. Mean excess weight loss (EWL) was always better in the RYGBP group (P=0.0013). The percentage of failure, defined as EWL <25%, was not significantly different between the two procedures. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the total number of non-metabolic complications, and the only statistically significant difference observed in metabolic complications was vitamin B12 deficiency after RYGBP. Frequency of vomiting was significantly less and quality of eating significantly better in RYGBP than in VBG patients.
CONCLUSION: This prospective long-term study, with nearly complete follow-up, suggests that in the non-superobese population, preoperative eating habits may play a role in choosing the most appropriate bariatric operation for each patient. Although RYGBP is associated with better mean weight loss outcomes, the percentage of patients who achieved and maintained > or = 50% EWL after VBG in this pre-selected patient population was not significantly different. Each type of operation has advantages and disadvantages, and, if properly chosen, a purely restrictive procedure can be successful for some patients. Therefore, it can be said that the decision regarding which bariatric procedure to perform in non-superobese patients must be based on in-depth preoperative evaluation as well as the patients' own preferences and outcome expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16469216     DOI: 10.1381/096089206775565096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  18 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  D J Davies; J M Baxter; J N Baxter
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Cost-effective restrictive bariatric surgery: laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric band.

Authors:  Peter Ojo; Elmer Valin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Health-related quality of life following vertical banded gastroplasty.

Authors:  Gerbrand C M van Hout; Frederiek A M Fortuin; Aline J M Pelle; Marieke E Blokland-Koomen; Guus L van Heck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and long limbs: advances in surgical treatment for super-obesity.

Authors:  Fotis Kalfarentzos; George Skroubis; Stavros Karamanakos; Marianna Argentou; Nancy Mead; Ioannis Kehagias; Theodore K Alexandrides
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Gastroesophageal reflux after vertical banded gastroplasty is alleviated by conversion to gastric bypass.

Authors:  M Ekelund; S Oberg; R Peterli; S G Frederiksen; J L Hedenbro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Thomas B Roshek; Helen G Mayo; Ryan Gallagher; Steven H Belle; Edward H Livingston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Resolution of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in patients with morbid obesity.

Authors:  Theodore K Alexandrides; George Skroubis; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Nutritional deficiencies in obesity and after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Stavra A Xanthakos
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.278

9.  Greater short-term weight loss in women 20-45 versus 55-65 years of age following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Christopher N Ochner; Julio Teixeira; Nori Geary; Lori Asarian
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Weight loss and eating behavior following vertical banded gastroplasty.

Authors:  Gerbrand C M van Hout; Jack J Jakimowicz; Frederiek A M Fortuin; Aline J M Pelle; Guus L van Heck
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.