Literature DB >> 16468082

Stated preferences of patients with cancer for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains during treatment.

David Osoba1, Ming-Ann Hsu, Catherine Copley-Merriman, John Coombs, F Reed Johnson, Brett Hauber, Ranjani Manjunath, Amanda Pyles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is postulated that patients with different cancer diagnoses, stages of disease and treatments will exhibit different individual preferences for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) functional domains and symptoms.
METHODS: A stated-preference (SP) instrument incorporating all functional domains and symptoms of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) was administered to 400 patients with either breast (n = 150); colorectal (n = 150) or non-small cell lung cancer (n = 100) who had previously experienced chemotherapy. The SP survey asked patients to make choices between a series of hypothetical functional/symptom pairs defined by combinations of HRQOL attributes, and depicted by levels of functioning and symptomatology.
RESULTS: In the 400 patients, considered as one group, role, cognitive, and social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, appetite loss, diarrhea and financial difficulties were most important, whereas physical and emotional functioning, dyspnea, constipation and insomnia were less important. The four effects that patients with breast cancer most wished to avoid were nausea and vomiting, pain, and decreases in emotional and role functioning. Patients with colorectal cancer listed diarrhea as the second most important effect to avoid (after nausea/vomiting, but before pain and role functioning), whereas those with non-small cell lung cancer listed dyspnea as the fourth most important effect to avoid.
CONCLUSION: These results provide more precise information regarding patient treatment concerns than that provided by the usual measurement of HRQOL. This information can be used by clinical trial investigators to design more precise interventions to improve HRQOL in the domains of greatest importance to patients and by all health care professionals to improve counseling of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16468082     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-0580-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

1.  Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach.

Authors:  F R Johnson; M R Banzhaf; W H Desvousges
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud; Theodore Pincus
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10

Review 3.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Eliciting stated health preferences: an application to willingness to pay for longevity.

Authors:  F R Johnson; W H Desvousges; M C Ruby; D Stieb; P De Civita
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.

Authors:  M Ryan; J Hughes
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  On the receiving end. V: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993.

Authors:  A M Griffin; P N Butow; A S Coates; A M Childs; P M Ellis; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia.

Authors:  F Wolfe; S X Kong
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index.

Authors:  D A Revicki; N K Leidy; F Brennan-Diemer; S Sorensen; A Togias
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Are chemotherapy patients' HRQoL importance weights consistent with linear scoring rules? A stated-choice approach.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; A Brett Hauber; David Osoba; Ming-Ann Hsu; John Coombs; Catherine Copley-Merriman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  21 in total

1.  Patient preferences and linear scoring rules for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ateesha F Mohamed; A Brett Hauber; F Reed Johnson; Cheryl D Coon
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Dexiang Zhu; Li Liang; Lechi Ye; Qi Lin; Yunshi Zhong; Ye Wei; Li Ren; Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Sleep, immunity and inflammation in gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Tauseef Ali; James Choe; Ahmed Awab; Theodore L Wagener; William C Orr
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Ateesha F Mohamed; F Reed Johnson; Olatoye Oyelowo; Bradley H Curtis; Cheryl Coon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Measurement accuracy in assessing patient's quality of life: to weight or not to weight domains of quality of life.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Thomas V Merluzzi; Amy Peterman; Lisa B Cronk
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Lisa A Prosser; James K Hammitt; Ron Keren
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Beyond standard quality of life measures: the subjective experiences of living with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Barat J Wolfe; Fuschia M Sirois
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Challenges of disorders of sex development: diverse perceptions across stakeholders.

Authors:  Barry A Kogan; Melissa Gardner; Adrianne N Alpern; Laura M Cohen; Mary Beth Grimley; Alexandra L Quittner; David E Sandberg
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.852

9.  Cognitive and psychological factors associated with early posttreatment functional outcomes in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Stephanie A Reid-Arndt; Albert Yee; Michael C Perry; Catherine Hsieh
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2009

10.  Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Patricia Moritz; Joyal Miranda
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.