BACKGROUND: Multi-item health status measures can be lengthy, expensive, and burdensome to collect. Single-item measures may be an alternative. We compared measurement properties of two single-item, general self-rated health (GSRH) questions to assess how well they captured information in a validated, multi-item instrument. METHODS: We administered a general health survey (SF-12V) that included "standard" and "comparative" forms of a GSRH. We repeated the survey two weeks later to the same 75 medically stable outpatients to test for GSRH reproducibility, reliability, and validity using SF-12V Physical Functioning and Emotional Health subscales as a reference. RESULTS: At each survey administration, the two GSRH questions demonstrated good alternate forms reliability (first administration: r = 0.74, p < 0.001; second administration: r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and good reproducibility ("standard": ICC 0.69; "comparative": ICC 0.85). Both GSRH items correlated with physical functioning ("standard": r = 0.66; "comparative": r = 0.56) and emotional health measures ("standard": r = 0.65; "comparative": r = 0.59). Mean subscale measures associated with responses in each GSRH category were significantly different (ANOVA, p < 0.001), indicating strong discriminant scale performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-item, GSRH questions demonstrated good reproducibility, reliability, and strong concurrent and discriminant scale performance with an established health status measure.
BACKGROUND: Multi-item health status measures can be lengthy, expensive, and burdensome to collect. Single-item measures may be an alternative. We compared measurement properties of two single-item, general self-rated health (GSRH) questions to assess how well they captured information in a validated, multi-item instrument. METHODS: We administered a general health survey (SF-12V) that included "standard" and "comparative" forms of a GSRH. We repeated the survey two weeks later to the same 75 medically stable outpatients to test for GSRH reproducibility, reliability, and validity using SF-12V Physical Functioning and Emotional Health subscales as a reference. RESULTS: At each survey administration, the two GSRH questions demonstrated good alternate forms reliability (first administration: r = 0.74, p < 0.001; second administration: r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and good reproducibility ("standard": ICC 0.69; "comparative": ICC 0.85). Both GSRH items correlated with physical functioning ("standard": r = 0.66; "comparative": r = 0.56) and emotional health measures ("standard": r = 0.65; "comparative": r = 0.59). Mean subscale measures associated with responses in each GSRH category were significantly different (ANOVA, p < 0.001), indicating strong discriminant scale performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-item, GSRH questions demonstrated good reproducibility, reliability, and strong concurrent and discriminant scale performance with an established health status measure.
Authors: J A Sloan; C L Loprinzi; S A Kuross; A W Miser; J R O'Fallon; M R Mahoney; I M Heid; M E Bretscher; N L Vaught Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher G Slatore; Laura M Cecere; Lynn F Reinke; Linda Ganzini; Edmunds M Udris; Brianna R Moss; Chris L Bryson; J Randall Curtis; David H Au Journal: Chest Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Regina Kwon; Larry A Allen; Laura D Scherer; Jocelyn S Thompson; Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud; Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Cristóbal Esteban; José M Quintana; Javier Moraza; Myriam Aburto; Urko Aguirre; José I Aguirregomoscorta; Susana Aizpiri; Luis V Basualdo; Alberto Capelastegui Journal: BMC Med Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Leonard W Poon; Peter Martin; Alex Bishop; Jinmyoung Cho; Grace da Rosa; Neha Deshpande; Robert Hensley; Maurice Macdonald; Jennifer Margrett; G Kevin Randall; John L Woodard; L Stephen Miller Journal: Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2010-09-26
Authors: Clio Spanou; Sharon A Simpson; Kerry Hood; Adrian Edwards; David Cohen; Stephen Rollnick; Ben Carter; Jim McCambridge; Laurence Moore; Elizabeth Randell; Timothy Pickles; Christine Smith; Claire Lane; Fiona Wood; Hazel Thornton; Chris C Butler Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 2.497