Literature DB >> 16466932

Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: on the possible role of action simulation in synchronization.

Peter E Keller1, Günther Knoblich, Bruno H Repp.   

Abstract

Ensemble musicians play in synchrony despite expressively motivated irregularities in timing. We hypothesized that synchrony is achieved by each performer internally simulating the concurrent actions of other ensemble members, relying initially on how they would perform in their stead. Hence, musicians should be better at synchronizing with recordings of their own earlier performances than with others' recordings. We required pianists to record one part from each of several piano duets, and later to play the complementary part in synchrony with their own or others' recordings. The pianists were also asked to identify their own recordings. The pianists were better at synchronizing with their own than with others' performances, and they were able to recognize their own recordings. Furthermore, synchronization accuracy and recognition were correlated: Pianists who were relatively accurate at synchronizing with their own performances were also good at recognizing them. Thus, action simulation may underlie both synchronization and self-recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16466932     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  65 in total

1.  Auditory-motor learning influences auditory memory for music.

Authors:  Rachel M Brown; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action.

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Luca F Ticini; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Self versus other in piano performance: detectability of timing perturbations depends on personal playing style.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  How and when auditory action effects impair motor performance.

Authors:  Alessandro D'Ausilio; Riccardo Brunetti; Franco Delogu; Cristina Santonico; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions.

Authors:  Lincoln J Colling; William F Thompson; John Sutton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Assimilation and contrast: the two sides of specific interference between action and perception.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-10

8.  The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Nadine Pecenka; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.

Authors:  Idil Kokal; Christian Keysers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Keeping an eye on the violinist: motor experts show superior timing consistency in a visual perception task.

Authors:  Clemens Wöllner; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.