Literature DB >> 16466422

Doing better but feeling worse. Looking for the "best" job undermines satisfaction.

Sheena S Iyengar1, Rachael E Wells, Barry Schwartz.   

Abstract

Expanding upon Simon's (1955) seminal theory, this investigation compared the choice-making strategies of maximizers and satisficers, finding that maximizing tendencies, although positively correlated with objectively better decision outcomes, are also associated with more negative subjective evaluations of these decision outcomes. Specifically, in the fall of their final year in school, students were administered a scale that measured maximizing tendencies and were then followed over the course of the year as they searched for jobs. Students with high maximizing tendencies secured jobs with 20% higher starting salaries than did students with low maximizing tendencies. However, maximizers were less satisfied than satisficers with the jobs they obtained, and experienced more negative affect throughout the job-search process. These effects were mediated by maximizers' greater reliance on external sources of information and their fixation on realized and unrealized options during the search and selection process.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16466422     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  Choosing to be happy? Age differences in "maximizing" decision strategies and experienced emotional well-being.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker; JoNell Strough
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-02-25

2.  Late-life Depression, Suicidal Ideation, and Attempted Suicide: The Role of Individual Differences in Maximizing, Regret, and Negative Decision Outcomes.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Andrew M Parker; Katalin Szanto
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2015-05-11

3.  Choice, numeracy, and physicians-in-training performance: the case of Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Talya Miron-Shatz; Helen Cole; Mary Himmelstein; Alex D Federman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Choice set size and decision making: the case of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.

Authors:  M Kate Bundorf; Helena Szrek
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Neuroanatomical substrates of maximizing tendency in decision-making: a voxel-based morphometric study.

Authors:  Hanqi Zhang; Shiyu Wei; Yajie Wang; Jie Feng
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.224

6.  Taking Decisions Too Seriously: Why Maximizers Often Get Mired in Choices.

Authors:  Mo Luan; Zhengtai Liu; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-15

7.  A New Look at the Impact of Maximizing on Unhappiness: Two Competing Mediating Effects.

Authors:  Jiaxi Peng; Jiaxi Zhang; Yan Zhang; Pinjia Gong; Bing Han; Hao Sun; Fei Cao; Danmin Miao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-06

8.  Maximizing Without Borders: Evidence That Maximizing Transcends Decision Domains.

Authors:  Michail D Kokkoris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-15

9.  High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Increases Maximization Tendencies.

Authors:  Haixia Wang; Hanqi Zhang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Values clarification in a decision aid about fertility preservation: does it add to information provision?

Authors:  Mirjam M Garvelink; Moniek M ter Kuile; Anne M Stiggelbout; Marieke de Vries
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.