Literature DB >> 20658834

Choice, numeracy, and physicians-in-training performance: the case of Medicare Part D.

Yaniv Hanoch1, Talya Miron-Shatz, Helen Cole, Mary Himmelstein, Alex D Federman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined the effect of choice-set size and numeracy levels on a physician-in-training's ability to choose appropriate Medicare drug plans.
DESIGN: Medical students and internal medicine residents (N = 100) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 surveys, differing only in the number of plans to be evaluated (3, 10, and 20). After reviewing information about stand-alone Medicare prescription drug plans, participants answered questions about what plan they would advise 2 hypothetical patients to choose on the basis of a brief summary of the relevant concerns of each patient. Participants also completed an 11-item numeracy scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ability to answer correctly questions about hypothetical Medicare Part D insurance plans and numeracy levels.
RESULTS: Consistent with our hypotheses, increases in choice sets correlated significantly with fewer correct answers, and higher numeracy levels were associated with more correct answers. Hence, our data further highlight the role of numeracy in financial- and health-related decision making, and also raise concerns about physicians' ability to help patients choose the optimal Part D plan.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that even physicians-in-training perform more poorly when choice size is larger, thus raising concerns about the capacity of physicians-in-training to successfully navigate Medicare Part D and help their patients pick the best drug plan. Our results also illustrate the importance of numeracy in evaluating insurance-related information and the need for enhancing numeracy skills among medical students and physicians. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658834      PMCID: PMC5605761          DOI: 10.1037/a0019881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  17 in total

1.  Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Michael Pignone
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Task complexity and older adults' decision-making competence.

Authors:  Melissa L Finucane; C K Mertz; Paul Slovic; Elizabeth Scholze Schmidt
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-03

3.  Numeracy and decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; C K Mertz; Ketti Mazzocco; Stephan Dickert
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

4.  Identifying widely covered drugs and drug coverage variation among Medicare part D formularies.

Authors:  Chien-Wen Tseng; Carol M Mangione; Robert H Brook; Emmett Keeler; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Doing better but feeling worse. Looking for the "best" job undermines satisfaction.

Authors:  Sheena S Iyengar; Rachael E Wells; Barry Schwartz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-02

6.  Medicare Part D: practical and policy implications for family physicians.

Authors:  Giridhar Mallya; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 7.  Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; David Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  How much choice is too much? The case of the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice; Janet Cummings; Stacey Wood
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Physician numeracy: essential skills for practicing evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Goutham Rao
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 10.  Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Valerie F Reyna; Angela Fagerlin; Isaac Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-08-02
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Big Data in Science and Healthcare: A Review of Recent Literature and Perspectives. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group.

Authors:  M M Hansen; T Miron-Shatz; A Y S Lau; C Paton
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

2.  Enrollment in prescription drug insurance: the interaction of numeracy and choice set size.

Authors:  Helena Szrek; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Rebecca Howe; Talya Miron-Shatz; Yaniv Hanoch; Zehra B Omer; Cristina O'Donoghue; Elissa M Ozanne
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in physicians.

Authors:  Felicitas M Schmidt; Jan M Zottmann; Maximilian Sailer; Martin R Fischer; Markus Berndt
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Physician trainees' decision making and information processing: choice size and Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Andrew J Barnes; Yaniv Hanoch; Melissa Martynenko; Stacey Wood; Thomas Rice; Alex D Federman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Developing a Better and More User-Friendly Numeracy Scale for Patients.

Authors:  W Trey Hill; Gary L Brase; Kevin L Kenney
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-08

7.  Seniors don't use Medicare.Gov: how do eligible beneficiaries obtain information about Medicare Advantage Plans in the United States?

Authors:  Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez; Kristy L Blackwood; Marquisele Mercedes; Kyle A Moody
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Health numeracy in Japan: measures of basic numeracy account for framing bias in a highly numerate population.

Authors:  Masako Okamoto; Yasushi Kyutoku; Manabu Sawada; Lester Clowney; Eiju Watanabe; Ippeita Dan; Keiko Kawamoto
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Edward T Cokely; Ulrich Hoffrage
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-16

10.  mHealth 2.0: Experiences, Possibilities, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Stefan Becker; Talya Miron-Shatz; Nikolaus Schumacher; Johann Krocza; Clarissa Diamantidis; Urs-Vito Albrecht
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 4.773

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.