Literature DB >> 16463351

Contrast behavior and relaxation effects of conventional and hyperecho-turbo spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T.

Matthias Weigel1, Juergen Hennig.   

Abstract

To overcome specific absorption rate (SAR) limitations of spin-echo-based MR imaging techniques, especially at (ultra) high fields, rapid acquisition relaxation enhancement/TSE (turbo spin echo)/fast spin echo sequences in combination with constant or variable low flip angles such as hyperechoes and TRAPS (hyperTSE) have been introduced. Due to the multiple spin echo and stimulated echo pathways involved in the signal formation, the contrast behavior of such sequences depends on both T2 and T1 relaxation times. In this work, constant and various variable flip angle sequences were analyzed in a volunteer study. It is demonstrated that a single effective echo time parameter TE(eff) can be calculated that accurately describes the overall T2 weighted image contrast. TE(eff) can be determined by means of the extended phase graph concept and is practically independent of field strength. Using the described formalism, the contrast of any TSE sequence can be predicted. HyperTSE sequences are demonstrated to show a robust and well-defined T2 contrast allowing clinical routine MRI to be performed with SAR reductions of typically at least 70%. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16463351     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  19 in total

Review 1.  In vivo structural imaging of the cerebellum, the contribution of ultra-high fields.

Authors:  José P Marques; Rolf Gruetter; Wietske van der Zwaag
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Hyperecho-turbo spin-echo sequences at 3T: clinical application in neuroradiology.

Authors:  R H Tetzlaff; I Mader; W Küker; J Weber; S Ziyeh; A Schulze-Bonhage; J Hennig; M Weigel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Authors:  Michael E Moseley; Chunlei Liu; Sandra Rodriguez; Thomas Brosnan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Fast T2 mapping with multiple echo, Caesar cipher acquisition and model-based reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher L Lankford; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  [Problems and chances of high field magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  M E Ladd; M Bock
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Image quality and cancer visibility of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  E K Vos; M W Lagemaat; J O Barentsz; J J Fütterer; P Zámecnik; H Roozen; S Orzada; A K Bitz; M C Maas; T W J Scheenen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Advanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Danielle V Hill; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  [3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in children and adults with congenital heart disease].

Authors:  I Voges; M Jerosch-Herold; M Helle; C Hart; H-H Kramer; C Rickers
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Combined acquisition technique (CAT) for high-field neuroimaging with reduced RF power.

Authors:  Morwan Choli; Martin Blaimer; Felix A Breuer; Philipp Ehses; Oliver Speck; Andreas J Bartsch; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Reducing ghosting due to k-space discontinuities in fast spin echo (FSE) imaging by a new combination of k-space ordering and parallel imaging.

Authors:  David W Carmichael; David L Thomas; Roger J Ordidge
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.