Literature DB >> 16461865

Injectable, sustained-release naltrexone for the treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Sandra D Comer1, Maria A Sullivan, Elmer Yu, Jami L Rothenberg, Herbert D Kleber, Kyle Kampman, Charles Dackis, Charles P O'Brien.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Oral naltrexone can completely antagonize the effects produced by opioid agonists. However, poor compliance with naltrexone has been a major obstacle to the effective treatment of opioid dependence.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a sustained-release depot formulation of naltrexone in treating opioid dependence. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial conducted at 2 medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty heroin-dependent adults.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were stratified by sex and years of heroin use (> or = 5 vs < 5) and then were randomized to receive placebo or 192 or 384 mg of depot naltrexone. Doses were administered at the beginning of weeks 1 and 5. All participants received twice-weekly relapse prevention therapy, provided observed urine samples, and completed other assessments at each visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retention in treatment and percentage of opioid-negative urine samples.
RESULTS: Retention in treatment was dose related, with 39%, 60%, and 68% of patients in the placebo, 192 mg of naltrexone, and 384 mg of naltrexone groups, respectively, remaining in treatment at the end of 2 months. Time to dropout had a significant main effect of dose, with mean time to dropout of 27, 36, and 48 days for the placebo, 192 mg of naltrexone, and 384 mg of naltrexone groups, respectively. The percentage of urine samples negative for opioids, methadone, cocaine, benzodiazepines, and amphetamine varied significantly as a function of dose. When the data were recalculated without the assumption that missing urine samples were positive, a main effect of group was not found for any drugs tested except cocaine, where the percentage of cocaine-negative urine samples was lower in the placebo group. Adverse events were minimal and generally mild. This formulation of naltrexone was well tolerated and produced a robust, dose-related increase in treatment retention.
CONCLUSION: These data provide new evidence of the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerability of long-lasting antagonist treatments for opioid dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461865      PMCID: PMC4200530          DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  42 in total

Review 1.  Worst-rank score analysis with informatively missing observations in clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-10

2.  Biocompatible implants for the sustained zero-order release of narcotic antagonists.

Authors:  R A Abrahams; S H Ronel
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1975-05

Review 3.  College on Problems of Drug Dependence taskforce on prescription opioid non-medical use and abuse: position statement.

Authors:  James Zacny; George Bigelow; Peggy Compton; Kathleen Foley; Martin Iguchi; Christine Sannerud
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Predicting cocaine use among methadone patients: analysis of findings from a national study.

Authors:  G H Dunteman; W S Condelli; J A Fairbank
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1992-06

5.  Depot naltrexone: long-lasting antagonism of the effects of heroin in humans.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Eric D Collins; Herbert D Kleber; Elie S Nuwayser; James H Kerrigan; Marian W Fischman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Naltrexone in the treatment of heroin dependence: relationship with depression and risk of overdose.

Authors:  Alison J Ritter
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.744

7.  Hepatitis C prevalence among Australian injecting drug users in the 1970s and profiles of virus genotypes in the 1970s and 1990s.

Authors:  A J Freeman; A Zekry; L R Whybin; C E Harvey; I A van Beek; S L de Kantzow; W D Rawlinson; C R Boughton; P W Robertson; G Marinos; A R Lloyd
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-06-19       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  A pilot study to assess the impact of naltrexone implant on accidental opiate overdose in 'high-risk' adolescent heroin users.

Authors:  Gary K Hulse; Robert J Tait
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 9.  A systematic review on the efficacy of naltrexone maintenance treatment in opioid dependence.

Authors:  Ursula Kirchmayer; Marina Davoli; Annette D Verster; Laura Amato; Arica Ferri; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Serious adverse events in the Australian National Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Dependence (NEPOD).

Authors:  E Digiusto; A Shakeshaft; A Ritter; S O'Brien; R P Mattick
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  140 in total

1.  Maintenance of reinforcement to address the chronic nature of drug addiction.

Authors:  Kenneth Silverman; Anthony DeFulio; Sigurdur O Sigurdsson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Opioid challenge evaluation of blockade by extended-release naltrexone in opioid-abusing adults: dose-effects and time-course.

Authors:  George E Bigelow; Kenzie L Preston; John Schmittner; Qunming Dong; David R Gastfriend
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Opioid detoxification and naltrexone induction strategies: recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Stacey C Sigmon; Adam Bisaga; Edward V Nunes; Patrick G O'Connor; Thomas Kosten; George Woody
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Addiction treatment-related employment barriers: the impact of methadone maintenance.

Authors:  Lindsey Richardson; Evan Wood; Julio Montaner; Thomas Kerr
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-02-01

6.  Advances in opioid antagonist treatment for opioid addiction.

Authors:  Walter Ling; Larissa Mooney; Li-Tzy Wu
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-10

Review 7.  Use of naltrexone to treat opioid addiction in a country in which methadone and buprenorphine are not available.

Authors:  Evgeny Krupitsky; Edwin Zvartau; George Woody
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Extended-release injectable naltrexone for opioid use disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brantley P Jarvis; August F Holtyn; Shrinidhi Subramaniam; D Andrew Tompkins; Emmanuel A Oga; George E Bigelow; Kenneth Silverman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Scopolamine detoxification technique for heroin dependence: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Longhui Li; Wenwen Shen; Xueyong Shen; Guodong Yang; Wenhua Zhou
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  NIDA Clinical Trials Network CTN-0051, Extended-Release Naltrexone vs. Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment (X:BOT): Study design and rationale.

Authors:  Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo Mpa; Genie L Bailey; Gregory S Brigham; Allan J Cohen; Marc Fishman; Walter Ling; Robert Lindblad; Dikla Shmueli-Blumberg; Don Stablein; Jeanine May; Dagmar Salazar; David Liu; John Rotrosen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.