Literature DB >> 16461201

A multicenter, 14-week study of telmisartan and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Yves Lacourcière1, Joel M Neutel, Gloria Davidai, Steve Koval.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) has a circadian pattern with a morning surge that is associated with an increased risk of acute coronary and cerebrovascular events. In a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, multicenter, forced-titration study of telmisartan and ramipril, the efficacy of both drugs on mean ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) and systolic BP (SBP) during the last 6 h of a 24-h dosing interval was evaluated.
METHODS: After screening and a single-blind run-in phase, 812 adults with mild-to-moderate hypertension (defined as a mean seated DBP > or =95 mm Hg and < or =109 mm Hg and a 24-h ABPM mean DBP 7 > or = 85 mm Hg) were randomized to the open-label, 14-week, forced-titration, active-treatment phase as follows: telmisartan 40 mg/80 mg/80 mg (n = 405) or ramipril 2.5 mg/5 mg/10 mg (n = 407), once daily in the morning. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the last 6-h mean DBP and SBP at 8 and 14 weeks as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Secondary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in BP control during each of the 24-h periods and in-clinic trough cuff BP.
RESULTS: Telmisartan 80 mg was superior to ramipril 5 mg and 10 mg in change from baseline in the last 6-h ABPM mean DBP and SBP at both 8 and 14 weeks (both P < .0001), respectively. At 14 weeks, the adjusted mean change from baseline in DBP for telmisartan 80 mg was -8.8 mm Hg compared with that for ramipril 10 mg of -5.4 mm Hg (P < .0001). For SBP, the adjusted mean change from baseline for telmisartan 80 mg was -12.7 mm Hg compared with that for ramipril 10 mg of -7.9 mm Hg (P < .0001). At 14 weeks, telmisartan 80 mg also yielded superior reductions from baseline in trough cuff BP compared with ramipril 10 mg (DBP: -11.0 mm Hg v -7.8 mm Hg, respectively; SBP: -14.3 mm Hg v -9.1 mm Hg, respectively; both P < .0001). Measures of 24-h BP control favored telmisartan 80 mg versus ramipril 10 mg (P < .0001), as did other secondary ABPM endpoints during the daytime, night-time, and morning periods. Treatment-related adverse events were uncommon; patients treated with ramipril had a higher incidence of cough than those treated with telmisartan (10.1% v 1.5%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan 80 mg was consistently more effective than ramipril 10 mg in reducing both DBP and SBP during the last 6 h of the dosing interval, a measure of the early morning period when patients are at greatest risk of life-threatening cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Telmisartan 80 mg was also more effective than ramipril 10 mg in reducing BP throughout the entire 24-h dosing interval. Both drugs were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16461201     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  13 in total

Review 1.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Circadian rhythm and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shaw; Geoffrey H Tofler
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan.

Authors:  Domenico Galzerano; Cristina Capogrosso; Sara Di Michele; Antonio Galzerano; Paola Paparello; Diana Lama; Carlo Gaudio
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 4.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  No HOPE without proof: do ARBs meet the standard for cardiovascular protection?

Authors:  Peter Sleight; Anne Jakobsen; Jose Heroys; Ann Ralph; Tomas Rees; Michael Shaw
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-03-26

Review 6.  The morning blood pressure surge: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Priyesh V Patel; Justin L Wong; Rohit Arora
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Factors that favor the occurrence of cough in patients treated with ramipril--a pharmacoepidemiological study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wyskida; Edyta Jura-Szołtys; Mike Smertka; Aleksander Owczarek; Jerzy Chudek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-09

8.  Impact of telmisartan in modifying vascular risk.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Baguet; Olivier Ormezzano; Gilles Barone-Rochette
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 9.  Benefits of once-daily therapies in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  John M Flack; Samar A Nasser
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-12-21

Review 10.  What is a preferred angiotensin II receptor blocker-based combination therapy for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal impairment?

Authors:  Samir G Mallat
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.