Literature DB >> 16461033

Frequency and consequences of recording an electrocardiogram >10 minutes after arrival in an emergency room in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (from the CRUSADE Initiative).

Deborah B Diercks1, W Frank Peacock, Brian C Hiestand, Anita Y Chen, Charles V Pollack, J Douglas Kirk, Sidney C Smith, W Brian Gibler, E Magnus Ohman, Andra L Blomkalns, L Kristin Newby, Judith S Hochman, Eric D Peterson, Matthew T Roe.   

Abstract

We sought to determine the frequency of electrocardiographic (ECG) acquisition within 10 minutes of hospital arrival, factors associated with delayed ECG acquisition, and any relation among delayed ECG acquisition, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. We therefore analyzed data from 63,478 patients (26,615 women, 42%) with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (designated by positive cardiac markers and/or ischemic ST-segment changes) who were enrolled in the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative from February 2001 to March 2004. Patients were categorized based on time to electrocardiography as delayed (>10 minutes from hospital arrival) or nondelayed (<10 minutes). Multivariable predictors of delayed ECG acquisition were determined. Overall, median time to electrocardiography was 15 minutes (25th to 75th percentile 7 to 32). ECG acquisition was delayed (median 25 minutes, 25th to 75th percentile 16 to 50) in 41,397 patients (65.2%). In the remaining 34.8%, time to electrocardiography was <10 minutes (median 5 minutes, 25th to 75th percentile 3 to 8). Women were more likely than men to have delayed ECG acquisition (69% vs 62%), and female gender was the most significant predictor of delayed ECG acquisition (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 1.34). In conclusion, only 33% of high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome had an initial electrocardiogram obtained <10 minutes of arrival as recommended. Women were significantly more likely than men to have delayed ECG acquisition. Emergency departments should focus on decreasing the time to initial ECG acquisition to improve treatment of acute coronary syndrome in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16461033     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (part 1).

Authors:  Shehzad Sami; James T Willerson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

2.  Accuracy of staff-initiated emergency department tracking system timestamps in identifying actual event times.

Authors:  Bradley D Gordon; Thomas J Flottemesch; Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  [Myocardial revascularization].

Authors:  H Möllmann; S Szardien; J Kempfert; H Nef; C Liebetrau; T Walther; C Hamm
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  [Myocardial revascularization].

Authors:  H Möllmann; S Szardien; J Kempfert; H Nef; C Liebetrau; T Walther; C Hamm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Pre- and early in-hospital procedures in patients with acute coronary syndromes: first results of the "German chest pain unit registry".

Authors:  Felix Post; Evangelos Giannitsis; Thomas Riemer; Lars S Maier; Claus Schmitt; Burghard Schumacher; Gerd Heusch; Harald Mudra; Thomas Voigtländer; Rainer Erbel; Harald Darius; Hugo Katus; Christian Hamm; Jochen Senges; Tommaso Gori; Thomas Münzel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Initial ECG acquisition within 10 minutes of arrival at the emergency department in persons with chest pain: time and gender differences.

Authors:  Jessica Zègre-Hemsey; Claire E Sommargren; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction in 58 U.S. emergency departments.

Authors:  Chu-Lin Tsai; David J Magid; Ashley F Sullivan; James A Gordon; Rainu Kaushal; P Michael Ho; Pamela N Peterson; David Blumenthal; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Gender differences in utilization of effective cardiovascular secondary prevention: a Cleveland clinic prevention database study.

Authors:  Leslie Cho; Byron Hoogwerf; Julie Huang; Danielle M Brennan; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Factors Influencing Time-Dependent Quality Indicators for Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel J France; Scott Levin; Ru Ding; Robin Hemphill; Jin Han; Stephan Russ; Dominik Aronsky; Matt Weinger
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.243

10.  Advanced units: quality measures in urgency and emergency care.

Authors:  Dan Carai Maia Viola; Eduardo Cordioli; Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti; Mauro Iervolino; Antonio da Silva Bastos Neto; Luis Roberto Natel de Almeida; Henrique Sutton de Sousa Neves; Claudio Luiz Lottenberg
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.