Literature DB >> 16460336

Preferences over dental restorative materials among young patients and dental professionals.

Ivar Espelid1, John Cairns, Jan E Askildsen, Vibeke Qvist, Torunn Gaarden, Anne B Tveit.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the patient's view is necessary, as patients' rights are an issue of increasing importance in dental practice. This study aimed to examine how dentists (n = 42), dental assistants (n = 65), and young dental patients (n = 306) in Norway and Denmark valued three attributes of dental restorations, namely, expected longevity, the appearance, and the risk of an adverse reaction. According to the discrete choice method, participants were presented with several scenarios, describing different levels of the attributes, for comparison of two restorations (A and B). The differences among patients, dentists, and dental assistants were examined by logistic regression analyses. The likelihood of a dentist favoring one restoration over another was very sensitive to the difference in the expected longevity of the restorations, and much less to differences in visibility. The patients had considerable sensitivity to differences in visibility and much less to differences in duration. Danish teenagers attach less importance to visibility of the restoration and greater importance to the risk of an adverse reaction than Norwegian teenagers. All differences were statistically significant. Preferences associated with properties of dental restorations differ between teenage patients and dental professionals and this should be addressed in clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16460336     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00282.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  9 in total

Review 1.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Sonia K Makhija; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  A comparison of the mechanical proprieties of different types of primary tooth restorations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Junhui Wang; Baize Zhang; Yujiang Chen; Lulu Wang; Yang Du; Xiaojing Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Balancing the risks and benefits associated with cosmetic dentistry - a joint statement by UK specialist dental societies.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher; K Hemmings; M Saunders; M Hunter; S Barclay; M Ashley; S Djemal; K Bishop; U Darbar; P Briggs; J Fearne
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Sara Khangura; Kelsey Seal; Monika Mierzwinski-Urban; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Philipp Sahrmann; Patrick Roger Schmidlin; Dell Davis; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; María Graciela Rasines Alcaraz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

6.  Designing a package of sexual and reproductive health and HIV outreach services to meet the heterogeneous preferences of young people in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Christine Michaels-Igbokwe; Mylene Lagarde; John Cairns; Fern Terris-Prestholt
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-05-09

7.  Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.

Authors:  Fahad Alkhudhairy
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-11-17

Review 8.  Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Katherine Milbers; Marie Hudson; Nick Bansback
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Sara Douf Alzanbaqi; Rakan Mishaal Alogaiel; Mohammed Ali Alasmari; Ahmed Mohammed Al Essa; Layla Nizar Khogeer; Basim Salem Alanazi; Eyad Sami Hawsah; Ahmed Mohammed Shaikh; Maria Salem Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.