Literature DB >> 16458209

Cardiac output measurement during infrarenal aortic surgery: echo-esophageal Doppler versus thermodilution catheter.

Aurélie Lafanechère1, Pierre Albaladejo, Mathieu Raux, Thomas Geeraerts, Rémi Bocquet, Anne Wernet, Yves Castier, Jean Marty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aortic surgery is associated with various hemodynamic and cardiac output modifications. These disorders may be partly caused by blood flow redistribution between supra-aortic and descending aorta regions during clamping and unclamping. A new echo-esophageal Doppler (Hemosonic 100; Arrow, Reading, PA) calculates cardiac output from a simultaneous measurement of blood flow velocity and diameter of the descending aorta. This calculation may be affected by blood redistribution during aortic clamping. The aim of this study was to compare cardiac output measured by echo-esophageal Doppler and by bolus thermodilution catheter during infrarenal aortic surgery.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: University hospital, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two adult patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Infrarenal aortic surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac outputs monitored by both devices were highly correlated during the whole surgical procedure (r2 ranging from 0.54 to 0.76). Bland and Altman analysis showed absence of significant bias before and after clamping (ranging from 0.1 +/- 0.73 L/min to 0.18 +/- 1 L/min, p > 0.05) and a significant bias of 0.5 +/- 1.05 L/min (p < 0.05) during aortic clamping. Limits of agreement did not differ significantly during the whole surgical procedure (ranging from -1.36/2.19 to -2.23/2.49). During clamping and unclamping, changes in cardiac output obtained by both methods were positively correlated (r2 = 0.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Bias between both methods was clinically acceptable, and limits of agreement were not significantly modified by aortic clamping. However, larger studies including homogenous aortic pathologies are necessary to validate this method during infrarenal aortic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16458209     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2005.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transesophageal Doppler devices: A technical review.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Chang Hyu Choi; Hong Soon Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Effect of different analgesic techniques on hemodynamic variables recorded with an esophageal Doppler monitor during ovariohysterectomy in dogs.

Authors:  Ignacio Sández; María Soto; Daniel Torralbo; Eva Rioja
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites.

Authors:  Sung Yong Park; Dae Hee Kim; Han Bum Joe; Ji Young Yoo; Jin Soo Kim; Min Kang; Yong Woo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-05-24

6.  Exploring measurement biases associated with esophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill patients in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter S Stawicki; Benjamin Braslow; Vicente H Gracias
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.219

7.  Noninvasive oscillometric cardiac output determination in the intensive care unit - comparison with invasive transpulmonary thermodilution.

Authors:  Alexander Reshetnik; Friederike Compton; Anna Schölzel; Markus Tölle; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.