PROBLEM: Rapid referral and management of patients with transient ischaemic attacks is a key component in the national strategy for stroke prevention. However, patients with transient ischaemic attacks are poorly identified and undertreated. DESIGN AND SETTING: Before and after evaluation of quality improvement programme with controlled comparison in three primary care trusts reflecting diverse populations and organisational structures in an urban district in the North of England. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: The proportion of patients receiving antiplatelet drugs and safe driving advice on referral to a specialty clinic, and the numbers of referrals, adjusted for age, to the specialist clinic before and after the improvement programme. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Interviews with patient and professionals to identify gaps and barriers to good practice; development of evidence based guidelines for the management of patients with transient ischaemic attacks; interactive multidisciplinary workshops for each primary care trust with feedback of individual audit results of referral practice; outreach visits to teams who were unable to attend the workshops; referral templates and desktop summaries to provide reminders of the guidelines to clinicians; incorporation of standards into professional contracts. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: A significant improvement occurred in identification and referral of patients with transient ischaemic attacks to specialist clinics, with a 41% increase in referrals from trained practices compared with control practices. There were also significant improvements in the early treatment and safety advice provided to patients before referral. LESSONS LEARNT: A strategic approach to effective quality improvement across a diverse health community is feasible and achievable. Careful planning with patient and professional involvement to develop a tailored and multifaceted quality improvement programme to implement evidence based practice can work in very different primary care settings. Key components of the effectiveness of the model include contextual analysis, strong professional support, clear recommendations based on robust evidence, simplicity of adoption, good communication, and use of established networks and opinion leaders.
PROBLEM: Rapid referral and management of patients with transient ischaemic attacks is a key component in the national strategy for stroke prevention. However, patients with transient ischaemic attacks are poorly identified and undertreated. DESIGN AND SETTING: Before and after evaluation of quality improvement programme with controlled comparison in three primary care trusts reflecting diverse populations and organisational structures in an urban district in the North of England. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: The proportion of patients receiving antiplatelet drugs and safe driving advice on referral to a specialty clinic, and the numbers of referrals, adjusted for age, to the specialist clinic before and after the improvement programme. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Interviews with patient and professionals to identify gaps and barriers to good practice; development of evidence based guidelines for the management of patients with transient ischaemic attacks; interactive multidisciplinary workshops for each primary care trust with feedback of individual audit results of referral practice; outreach visits to teams who were unable to attend the workshops; referral templates and desktop summaries to provide reminders of the guidelines to clinicians; incorporation of standards into professional contracts. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: A significant improvement occurred in identification and referral of patients with transient ischaemic attacks to specialist clinics, with a 41% increase in referrals from trained practices compared with control practices. There were also significant improvements in the early treatment and safety advice provided to patients before referral. LESSONS LEARNT: A strategic approach to effective quality improvement across a diverse health community is feasible and achievable. Careful planning with patient and professional involvement to develop a tailored and multifaceted quality improvement programme to implement evidence based practice can work in very different primary care settings. Key components of the effectiveness of the model include contextual analysis, strong professional support, clear recommendations based on robust evidence, simplicity of adoption, good communication, and use of established networks and opinion leaders.
Authors: Trevor A Sheldon; Nicky Cullum; Diane Dawson; Annette Lankshear; Karin Lowson; Ian Watt; Peter West; Dianne Wright; John Wright Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-10-30
Authors: P M Rothwell; A J Coull; M F Giles; S C Howard; L E Silver; L M Bull; S A Gutnikov; P Edwards; D Mant; C M Sackley; A Farmer; P A G Sandercock; M S Dennis; C P Warlow; J M Bamford; P Anslow Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-06-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lindsay Blank; Susan Baxter; Helen Buckley Woods; Elizabeth Goyder; Andrew Lee; Nick Payne; Melanie Rimmer Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: John Wright; John Bibby; Joe Eastham; Stephen Harrison; Maureen McGeorge; Chris Patterson; Nick Price; Daphne Russell; Ian Russell; Neil Small; Matt Walsh; John Young Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-02
Authors: Ally Xiang; Helen Smith; Paul Hine; Katy Mason; Stefania Lanza; Anna Cave; Jonathan Sergeant; Zoe Nicholson; Peter Devlin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Teresa M Damush; Edward J Miech; Jason J Sico; Michael S Phipps; Greg Arling; Jared Ferguson; Charles Austin; Laura Myers; Fitsum Baye; Cherie Luckhurst; Ava B Keating; Eileen Moran; Dawn M Bravata Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 9.910