Literature DB >> 16455088

Why fine-wire fixators work: an analysis of pressure distribution at the wire-bone interface.

T N Board1, L Yang, M Saleh.   

Abstract

Tensioned fine-wire external fixator systems have been used successfully for the treatment of fractures, mal-unions and for limb lengthening for many years. When used in metaphyseal bone, this type of fixator has a lower loosening rate than half-pin fixators. The differing mechanical properties of these fixator systems have been investigated extensively; however, most studies have centered on the mechanical properties of the fixator as a whole. Our knowledge of the interactions occurring at the interface between implant and bone remains sparse. In order to investigate this interaction, we devised a simple experimental model to characterise the distribution of pressure in cancellous bone surrounding a tensioned wire under loading conditions. Comparison was then made to a similar model of a half-pin fixator. Pressure was measured using pressure sensitive film at various distances away from the implant-bone interface. Static, single cycle loading of the model was performed with a Universal Testing Machine. Pressure distribution in the fine-wire model was found to occur in three regions: polar, beam loading and uniform. Polar patterns were seen closest to the wire with pressure concentrated at the entry and exit points of the wire. Beam loading was seen at a distance of 1.5 mm from the wire and pressure reached a uniform distribution at 4.0 mm. Most of the pressure measured was less than 2 MPa, which is less than the yield strength of cancellous bone (2-7 MPa). Higher loads produced higher stresses but the distribution pattern was similar. In contrast, the half-pin model showed far higher pressures (20 MPa), which were present deeper in the bone specimen. These results further our understanding of the biomechanics of fine-wire fixators and may explain the lower loosening rate of this type of fixator when compared to half-pin fixators used in metaphyseal bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16455088     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Analytical modelling of Kirschner wires in Ilizarov circular external fixator as pretensioned slender beams.

Authors:  A R Zamani; S O Oyadiji
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Towards a solution of the wires' slippage problem of the Ilizarov external fixator.

Authors:  C Bairaktari; G Athanassiou; E Panagiotopoulos; D Deligianni
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-08-20

3.  What Are the Biomechanical Properties of the Taylor Spatial Frame™?

Authors:  Daniel J Henderson; Jeremy L Rushbrook; Paul J Harwood; Todd D Stewart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  What Are the Biomechanical Effects of Half-pin and Fine-wire Configurations on Fracture Site Movement in Circular Frames?

Authors:  Daniel J Henderson; Jeremy L Rushbrook; Todd D Stewart; Paul J Harwood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Stability at the half pin-frame interface on external fixation constructs.

Authors:  Alexios Dimitrios Iliadis; Parag Kumar Jaiswal; Jay Meswania; Gordon Blunn; David Goodier; Peter Calder
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2016-10-13

6.  Comparative Stiffness Characteristics of Ilizarov- and Hexapod-type External Frame Constructs.

Authors:  Carl Fenton; Daniel Henderson; Mikhail Samchukov; Alexander Cherkashin; Hemant Sharma
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2021 Sep-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.