Literature DB >> 16453207

The da Vinci robotic system for general surgical applications: a critical interim appraisal.

Johannes Bodner1, Florian Augustin, Heinze Wykypiel, John Fish, Gilbert Muehlmann, Gerold Wetscher, Thomas Schmid.   

Abstract

PRINCIPLES: The recently introduced robotic surgical systems were developed to overcome the limitations of conventional minimally invasive surgery. We analyse the impact of the da Vinci robotic system on general surgery.
METHODS: The da Vinci operating robot is a telemanipulation system consisting of a surgical arm cart, a master console and a conventional monitor cart. Since its purchase in June 2001, 128 patients have undergone surgery using the da Vinci robot in our department. The mean age of the 78 female and 50 male patients was 52 (range 18-78) years.
RESULTS: The procedures included 29 cholecystectomies, 16 partial fundoplications, 16 extended thymectomies, 14 colonic interventions, 10 splenectomies, 10 bariatric procedures, 7 hernioplasties, 6 oesophageal interventions, 5 adrenalectomies, 5 lower lobectomies, 4 neurinomectomies and 6 others. 122 of 128 procedures (95%) were completed successfully with the da Vinci robot. Open conversion proved necessary in 4 patients due to surgical problems, and two other procedures were completed by conventional laparoscopy due to robot system technical errors. 30-day mortality was 0%, one redo-operation was necessary and two lower complications not requiring surgical re-intervention occurred. The resection margins of all tumour specimens were histologically tumour free.
CONCLUSIONS: Various general surgical procedures have proved feasible and safe when performed with the da Vinci robot. The advantage of the system is best seen in tiny areas difficult of access and when dissecting delicate, vulnerable anatomical structures. However, in view of longer operating times, higher costs and the lack of adequate instruments, robotic surgery does not at the moment represent a general alternative to conventional minimally invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16453207     DOI: 2005/45/smw-11022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  27 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robotic adrenal surgery: transperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Alexis K Okoh; Eren Berber
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Anthony J Senagore; Justin K Lawrence; Brad J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development of a compact laparoscope manipulator (P-arm).

Authors:  Mitsugu Sekimoto; Atsushi Nishikawa; Kazuhiro Taniguchi; Shuji Takiguchi; Fumio Miyazaki; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  State of the art of robotic thymectomy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ismail; Marc Swierzy; Jens C Rückert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Robotic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Ozer Makay; Varlik Erol; Murat Ozdemir
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-07

8.  Robotic approach for partial adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Benedetto Calì; Claire Nomine-Criqui; Florence Bihain; Laurent Brunaud
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 9.  Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michail Kornaropoulos; Demetrios Moris; Eliza W Beal; Marinos C Makris; Apostolos Mitrousias; Athanasios Petrou; Evangelos Felekouras; Adamantios Michalinos; Michail Vailas; Dimitrios Schizas; Alexandros Papalampros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jun Seok Park; Hyun Kang; Soo Yeun Park; Hye Jin Kim; In Teak Woo; In-Kyu Park; Gyu-Seog Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.