Literature DB >> 16452921

E-mail decay rates among corresponding authors in MEDLINE. The ability to communicate with and request materials from authors is being eroded by the expiration of e-mail addresses.

Jonathan D Wren1, Joe E Grissom, Tyrrell Conway.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16452921      PMCID： PMC1369259          DOI： 10.1038/sj.embor.7400631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Feasibility of quality-of-life research on the Internet: a follow-up study.

Authors:  J R Treadwell; R M Soetikno; L A Lenert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A probabilistic similarity metric for Medline records: a model for author name disambiguation.

Authors:  Vetle I Torvik; Marc Weeber; Don R Swanson; Neil R Smalheiser
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

4.  An experimental study of search in global social networks.

Authors:  Peter Sheridan Dodds; Roby Muhamad; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Information science. Going, going, gone: lost Internet references.

Authors:  Robert P Dellavalle; Eric J Hester; Lauren F Heilig; Amanda L Drake; Jeff W Kuntzman; Marla Graber; Lisa M Schilling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The grapefruit diet.

Authors:  T B Cross
Journal:  J Microgr       Date:  1983-04

7.  404 not found: the stability and persistence of URLs published in MEDLINE.

Authors:  Jonathan D Wren
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet.

Authors:  Jonathan D Wren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-12

Review 9.  The effects of electronic mail on communication in two health sciences institutions.

Authors:  T Singarella; J Baxter; R R Sandefur; C C Emery
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 10.  Electronic mail.

Authors:  M Pallen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-02
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do corresponding authors take responsibility for their work? A covert survey.

Authors:  Teun Teunis; Sjoerd P F T Nota; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Access to scientific publications: the scientist's perspective.

Authors:  Yegor Voronin; Askar Myrzahmetov; Alan Bernstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption.

Authors:  Ruzica Bojcic; Mate Todoric; Livia Puljak
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  From the past to the future: natural sound recordings and the preservation of the bioacoustics legacy in Portugal.

Authors:  Paulo A M Marques; Daniel M Magalhães; Susana F Pereira; Paulo E Jorge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.