Literature DB >> 16452540

The octreotide test dose is not a reliable predictor of the subsequent response to somatostatin analogue therapy in patients with acromegaly.

Ana Pokrajac1, Andrew G Claridge, S K Abdul Shakoor, Peter J Trainer.   

Abstract

In many centres, a test dose (TD) of octreotide is administered before commencing somatostatin analogue therapy (SAT), although the merits of this procedure are uncertain. We have analysed the value of the GH response to a TD in predicting the efficacy of subsequent SAT in 47 patients with acromegaly (25 male, median age 51 years, range 20-82). The primary goal of SAT was a mean GH of < 5 mU/l. Median baseline GH was 19.3 mU/l (2.2-233 mU/l) and with the TD fell by 78% (35-98%) to a nadir of 4.2 mU/l (< 0.3-85 mU/l). Optimal predictive power was observed when GH fell to < 5 mU/l after the TD. With this criterion, the TD had a positive predictive value (PPV) of achieving the primary goal on SAT of 82% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 50%. However, baseline GH was also highly predictive of the likelihood of successful SAT (GH < 5 mU/l). The GH response to the TD had PPV of 83% and NPV of 61% of normalising IGF-I on SAT. In summary, baseline GH and nadir after a TD are highly predictive of a good response to SAT; however, a poor response to a TD does not exclude an optimal response to SAT. Furthermore, failure to achieve biochemical control does not equate to no benefit, as biochemical improvement was seen in every patient; therefore, no patient should be deprived of octreotide therapy because of the result of a TD. In conclusion, our data indicate that the octreotide TD has no place in selecting patients for SAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16452540     DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  9 in total

1.  Predictive value of T2 relative signal intensity for response to somatostatin analogs in newly diagnosed acromegaly.

Authors:  Ming Shen; Qilin Zhang; Wenjuan Liu; Meng Wang; Jingjing Zhu; Zengyi Ma; Wenqiang He; Shiqi Li; Xuefei Shou; Yiming Li; Zhaoyun Zhang; Hongying Ye; Min He; Bin Lu; Zhenwei Yao; Yun Lu; Nidan Qiao; Zhao Ye; Yichao Zhang; Yeping Yang; Yao Zhao; Yongfei Wang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  The therapeutic response of somatotropinomas according to the T2-weighted signal intensity on the MRI.

Authors:  Carla-Liana Scânteie; Daniel-Corneliu Leucuţa; Cristina Ghervan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-10-30

Review 3.  Dynamic tests for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in acromegaly.

Authors:  Laure Cazabat; Jean-Claude Souberbielle; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  An audit of treatment outcome in acromegalic patients attending our center at Bergamo, Italy.

Authors:  Roberto Attanasio; Marcella Montini; Monia Valota; Liana Cortesi; Regina Barbò; Francesco Biroli; Giampiero Tonnarelli; Mascia Albizzi; Rosa Miranda Testa; Giorgio Pagani
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Biochemical Response to First-Line Treatment With Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly: A Real-Life Perspective.

Authors:  Federica Nista; Giuliana Corica; Lara Castelletti; Keyvan Khorrami; Claudia Campana; Francesco Cocchiara; Gabriele Zoppoli; Alessandro Prior; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Ferone; Federico Gatto
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  The Future of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly.

Authors:  Monica R Gadelha; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Leandro Kasuki
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel.

Authors:  Ferdinand Roelfsema; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes A Romijn
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-09

Review 8.  How are growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 reported as markers for drug effectiveness in clinical acromegaly research? A comprehensive methodologic review.

Authors:  Michiel J van Esdonk; Eline J M van Zutphen; Ferdinand Roelfsema; Alberto M Pereira; Piet H van der Graaf; Nienke R Biermasz; Jasper Stevens; Jacobus Burggraaf
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 9.  Pasireotide in the Personalized Treatment of Acromegaly.

Authors:  Manel Puig-Domingo; Ignacio Bernabéu; Antonio Picó; Betina Biagetti; Joan Gil; Cristina Alvarez-Escolá; Mireia Jordà; Montserrat Marques-Pamies; Berta Soldevila; María-Angeles Gálvez; Rosa Cámara; Javier Aller; Cristina Lamas; Mónica Marazuela
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.