Literature DB >> 16452494

Comparison of methods for determining renal function decline in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the consortium of radiologic imaging studies of polycystic kidney disease cohort.

Andrew D Rule1, Vicente E Torres, Arlene B Chapman, Jared J Grantham, Lisa M Guay-Woodford, Kyongtae T Bae, Saulo Klahr, William M Bennett, Catherine M Meyers, Paul A Thompson, J Philip Miller.   

Abstract

A decline in renal function suggests progression of chronic kidney disease. This can be determined by measured GFR (e.g., iothalamate clearance), serum creatinine (SCr)-based GFR estimates, or creatinine clearance. A cohort of 234 patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and baseline creatinine clearance>70 ml/min were followed annually for four visits. Iothalamate clearance, SCr, and creatinine clearance were obtained at each visit. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was determined with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault equations. Renal function slopes had a mean residual SD of 10.7% by iothalamate clearance, 8.2% by MDRD equation, 7.7% by Cockcroft-Gault equation, and 14.8% by creatinine clearance. By each method, a decline in renal function (lowest quintile slope) was compared among baseline predictors. Hypertension was associated with a decline in iothalamate clearance (odds ratio [OR] 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 to 14), eGFR (OR [MDRD] 2.0 [95% CI 1.0 to 4.2] or OR [Cockcroft-Gault] 1.9 [95% CI 0.9 to 3.9]), and creatinine clearance (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0 to 4.2). Each doubling of kidney volume at baseline was associated with a decline in iothalamate clearance (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.5 to 3.7), eGFR (OR 1.7 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.6] or 2.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 3.3]), and creatinine clearance (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.5). Predictor associations were strongest with measured GFR. Misclassification from changes in non-GFR factors (e.g., creatinine production, tubular secretion) conservatively biased associations with eGFR. Misclassification from method imprecision attenuated associations with creatinine clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16452494     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2005070697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  29 in total

Review 1.  The applicability of eGFR equations to different populations.

Authors:  Pierre Delanaye; Christophe Mariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Comparison of high glomerular filtration rate thresholds for identifying hyperfiltration.

Authors:  Harini A Chakkera; Aleksandar Denic; Walter K Kremers; Mark D Stegall; Joseph J Larson; Harish Ravipati; Sandra J Taler; John C Lieske; Lilach O Lerman; Joshua J Augustine; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Performance of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in a community-based sample of Blacks and Whites: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey; Hocine Tighiouart; Tariq Shafi; John H Eckfeldt; Craig Johnson; Aghogho Okparavero; Wendy S Post; Josef Coresh; Michael G Shlipak
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Performance of Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Estimating Equations Relative to Exogenously Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Persons.

Authors:  Gregory M Lucas; Mohamed G Atta; Katie Zook; Dhananjay Vaidya; Xueting Tao; Paula Maier; George J Schwartz
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  ADPKD: clinical issues before and after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Messa; Carlo Maria Alfieri; Emanuele Montanari; Mariano Ferraresso; Roberta Cerutti
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  A comparison of change in measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with nondiabetic kidney disease.

Authors:  Dawei Xie; Marshall M Joffe; Steven M Brunelli; Gerald Beck; Glenn M Chertow; Jeffrey C Fink; Tom Greene; Chi-yuan Hsu; John W Kusek; Richard Landis; James Lash; Andrew S Levey; Andrew O'Conner; Akinlolu Ojo; Mahboob Rahman; Raymond R Townsend; Hao Wang; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with glomerular filtration rates in living kidney donors.

Authors:  Emilio D Poggio; Andrew D Rule; Roberto Tanchanco; Susana Arrigain; Robert S Butler; Titte Srinivas; Brian R Stephany; Kathryn H Meyer; Saul Nurko; Richard A Fatica; Daniel A Shoskes; Venkatesh Krishnamurthi; David A Goldfarb; Inderbir Gill; Martin J Schreiber
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Low-dose rapamycin (sirolimus) effects in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: an open-label randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  William E Braun; Jesse D Schold; Brian R Stephany; Rita A Spirko; Brian R Herts
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Vicente E Torres; Arlene B Chapman; Olivier Devuyst; Ron T Gansevoort; Jared J Grantham; Eiji Higashihara; Ronald D Perrone; Holly B Krasa; John Ouyang; Frank S Czerwiec
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Accuracy and limitations of equations for predicting the glomerular filtration rate during follow-up of patients with non-diabetic nephropathies.

Authors:  Guy Rostoker; Pierre Andrivet; Isabelle Pham; Mireille Griuncelli; Serge Adnot
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.