BACKGROUND: Reliable estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are important in the clinical management of HIV-positive patients. Data on the performance of widely used estimating equations (eGFR) relative to exogenously measured GFR are sparse in this population. METHODS: We evaluated cross-sectional and longitudinal accuracy and bias of eGFR, based on creatinine and cystatin C, relative to disappearance of infused iohexol from plasma (iGFR) in a cohort of participants followed annually for up to 7 years. RESULTS: A total of 222 HIV-positive and 139 HIV-negative participants contributed 1240 visits with valid iGFR and eGFR measures. Estimated GFR based on both creatinine and cystatin C performed the best. Estimated GFR based on creatinine alone overestimated iGFR by 9 mL·min·1.73 m on average and was significantly less accurate in HIV-positive than HIV-negative individuals. The performance of equations based on either creatinine alone or cystatin C alone were significantly affected by participant factors (eg, non-suppressed HIV RNA, nadir CD4 count, hepatitis C virus coinfection). The average iGFR slope was -4% per year in HIV-positive participants. In both HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants, eGFR slope measures were generally unbiased but inaccurate, with only 60%-74% of observations falling within ±5% points of iGFR slope. CONCLUSIONS: Both creatinine and cystatin C have limitations as GFR indices in HIV-positive individuals. Estimated GFR based on both creatinine and cystatin C performed best in our study and may be preferred in HIV-positive persons with kidney disease or comorbidities that place them at high risk for kidney disease.
BACKGROUND: Reliable estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are important in the clinical management of HIV-positive patients. Data on the performance of widely used estimating equations (eGFR) relative to exogenously measured GFR are sparse in this population. METHODS: We evaluated cross-sectional and longitudinal accuracy and bias of eGFR, based on creatinine and cystatin C, relative to disappearance of infused iohexol from plasma (iGFR) in a cohort of participants followed annually for up to 7 years. RESULTS: A total of 222 HIV-positive and 139 HIV-negative participants contributed 1240 visits with valid iGFR and eGFR measures. Estimated GFR based on both creatinine and cystatin C performed the best. Estimated GFR based on creatinine alone overestimated iGFR by 9 mL·min·1.73 m on average and was significantly less accurate in HIV-positive than HIV-negative individuals. The performance of equations based on either creatinine alone or cystatin C alone were significantly affected by participant factors (eg, non-suppressed HIV RNA, nadir CD4 count, hepatitis C virus coinfection). The average iGFR slope was -4% per year in HIV-positive participants. In both HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants, eGFR slope measures were generally unbiased but inaccurate, with only 60%-74% of observations falling within ±5% points of iGFR slope. CONCLUSIONS: Both creatinine and cystatin C have limitations as GFR indices in HIV-positive individuals. Estimated GFR based on both creatinine and cystatin C performed best in our study and may be preferred in HIV-positive persons with kidney disease or comorbidities that place them at high risk for kidney disease.
Authors: Yuen-Ting Diana Kwong; Lesley A Stevens; Elizabeth Selvin; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Tom Greene; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Gary L Myers; W Greg Miller; Josef Coresh; James Fleming; Neil Greenberg; Tom Greene; Thomas Hostetter; Andrew S Levey; Mauro Panteghini; Michael Welch; John H Eckfeldt Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2005-12-06 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Gregory M Lucas; Michael J Ross; Peter G Stock; Michael G Shlipak; Christina M Wyatt; Samir K Gupta; Mohamed G Atta; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Paul A Pham; Leslie A Bruggeman; Jeffrey L Lennox; Patricio E Ray; Robert C Kalayjian Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tebogo Seape; Verena Gounden; Hendrick E van Deventer; Geoffrey P Candy; Jaya A George Journal: Ann Clin Biochem Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 2.057
Authors: Sharon L Walmsley; Antonio Antela; Nathan Clumeck; Dan Duiculescu; Andrea Eberhard; Felix Gutiérrez; Laurent Hocqueloux; Franco Maggiolo; Uriel Sandkovsky; Catherine Granier; Keith Pappa; Brian Wynne; Sherene Min; Garrett Nichols Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Tom Greene; Liang Li; Gerald J Beck; Marshall M Joffe; Marc Froissart; John W Kusek; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: G M Lucas; A Cozzi-Lepri; C M Wyatt; F A Post; A M Bormann; N F Crum-Cianflone; M J Ross Journal: HIV Med Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Bhavna Bhasin; Bryan Lau; Mohamed G Atta; Derek M Fine; Michelle M Estrella; George J Schwartz; Gregory M Lucas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mohamed G Atta; Katie Zook; Todd T Brown; Dhananjay Vaidya; Xueting Tao; Paula Maier; George J Schwartz; Gregory M Lucas Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 14.978