Literature DB >> 16452259

Does unilateral pedaling activate a rhythmic locomotor pattern in the nonpedaling leg in post-stroke hemiparesis?

S A Kautz1, C Patten, R R Neptune.   

Abstract

Recent investigation in persons with clinically complete spinal cord injury has revealed that locomotor activity in one limb can activate rhythmic locomotor activity in the opposite limb. Although our previous research has demonstrated profound influences of the nonparetic limb on paretic limb motor activity poststroke, the potency of interlimb pathways for increasing recruitment of the paretic limb motor pattern is unknown. This experiment tested whether there is an increased propensity for rhythmic motor activity in one limb (pedaling limb) to induce rhythmic motor activity in the opposite limb (test limb) in persons poststroke. Forty-nine subjects with chronic poststroke hemiparesis and twenty controls pedaled against a constant mechanical load with their pedaling leg while we recorded EMG and pedal forces from the test leg. For the experimental conditions, subjects were instructed to either pedal with their test leg (bilateral pedaling) or rest their test leg while it was either stationary or moved anti-phased (unilateral pedaling). In persons poststroke, unilateral pedaling activated a complete pattern of rhythmic alternating muscle activity in the nonpedaling, test leg. This effect was most clearly demonstrated in the most severely impaired individuals. In most of the control subjects, unilateral pedaling activated some muscles in the nonpedaling leg weakly, if at all. We propose that, ipsilateral excitatory pathways associated with contralateral pedaling in control subjects are increasingly up-regulated in both legs in persons with hemiparesis as a function of increased hemiparetic severity. This enhancement of interlimb pathways may be of functional importance since contralateral pedaling induced a complete motor pattern of similar amplitude to the bilateral pattern in both the paretic and nonparetic leg of the subjects with severe hemiparesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16452259     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00951.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

1.  Impaired interlimb coordination of voluntary leg movements in poststroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Shih-Chiao Tseng; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional implications of impaired control of submaximal hip flexion following stroke.

Authors:  Allison S Hyngstrom; Henry R Kuhnen; Kiersten M Kirking; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Atypical cortical drive during activation of the paretic and nonparetic tibialis anterior is related to gait deficits in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Alan R Needle; Ryan T Pohlig; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Visual feedback during pedaling allows individuals poststroke to alter inappropriately prolonged paretic vastus medialis activity.

Authors:  Christopher H Mullens; David A Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Robert Wityk; Kenneth Silver; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Gait asymmetry pattern following stroke determines acute response to locomotor task.

Authors:  Virginia L Little; Lindsay A Perry; Mae W V Mercado; Steven A Kautz; Carolynn Patten
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  EEG during pedaling: evidence for cortical control of locomotor tasks.

Authors:  Sanket Jain; Krishnaj Gourab; Sheila Schindler-Ivens; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Coordination of the non-paretic leg during hemiparetic gait: expected and novel compensatory patterns.

Authors:  Bhavana Raja; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Neural control of rhythmic arm cycling after stroke.

Authors:  E Paul Zehr; Pamela M Loadman; Sandra R Hundza
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.