Literature DB >> 16451846

Elemental mercury spills.

Thomas A Baughman1.   

Abstract

Sources of elemental mercury (Hg0) include old natural gas regulators, manometers, sphygmomanometers, thermometers, and thermostats. Causes of Hg0 spills include improper storage, container breakage, children playing with Hg0, the breakage of devices containing Hg0, and ritualistic use of Hg0. Inhalation is the primary exposure route for Hg0. Mercury released into the environment can enter lakes and streams, where bacteria convert it into methylmercury, which bioaccumulates in fish. Chronic exposure to Hg0 vapors can damage the kidneys and neurologic system. Short-term exposure to high levels of Hg0 vapors may cause lung damage, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, increases in blood pressure or heart rate, skin rashes, and eye irritation, among other effects. Minimizing Hg0 dispersal is important after an Hg0 spill. Tracking by shoes or apparel or vacuuming can spread Hg0, increasing airborne concentrations and cleanup costs. The Illinois Department of Public Health's response to an Hg0 spill depends on the size of the spill. Airborne concentrations after large spills are mapped with a mercury vapor analyzer (MVA). The cleanup begins with the spill site and any hot spots that were identified with the MVA. Hard surfaces can usually be cleaned, but contaminated porous items must be discarded. Leaving marginally contaminated items outdoors for a month or more during warm weather may dissipate the Hg0. After a cleanup, clearance sampling is conducted to determine if further cleanup is needed. The best way to prevent Hg0 spills is reduce its use. Key words: cleanup, elemental mercury, health effects, mercury, prevention, remediation, spill, spill management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16451846      PMCID: PMC1367823          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


Elemental mercury (Hg0), the silvery liquid most people associate with thermometers, is a liquid metal at room temperature. More than 13 times heavier than water, 1 tablespoon of Hg0 has a mass of about 150 g, and 1 L of Hg0 has a mass of about 13.5 kg. Hg0 evaporates slowly to produce vapors, the primary health concern.

How Hg0 Spills Occur

Hg0 spills occur in many ways, often because of unnecessary or improper storage. Zeitz et al. (2002) reported the types and relative frequencies of 413 Hg0 spills reported from 14 states. Ninety-six percent of the spills occurred at fixed locations, and 4% of the spills were transportation related. Of the fixed-location spills, the most frequent locations were schools or universities (20.3%), private residences (16.7%), health care facilities (16.5%), public utilities (12.6%), and manufacturing facilities (10.0%). People often keep Hg0 because they think it is valuable, but it is nearly worthless. Sometimes containers stored for years fall off shelves and break, or children find containers of Hg0 in a home or school and play with it. Zeitz et al. (2002) reported that in residences the most common causes of Hg0 spills were a spilled or dropped container (42%), children playing with Hg0 (32%), and equipment failure (17%). Schools often have containers with Hg0 (and other hazardous chemicals) that have been kept for many years. Zeitz et al. (2002) reported that children playing with Hg0 caused 46% of reported Hg0 spills in elementary and secondary schools. Other causes were a dropped or spilled container or instrument (18%), equipment failure (5%), and unknown (18%) (Zeitz et al. 2002). Table 1 lists the sources and causes of Hg0 spills investigated by the West Chicago Regional Office of the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). In one school that IDPH investigated, a sixth-grade student found a jar with about 4 lb Hg0 in an unlocked school cabinet. He threw beads of Hg0 into two hallways, and he gave Hg0 to friends, contaminating many areas of the school (Figure 1). The children thought they were having harmless fun. The school was unaware the Hg0 was present, although it was likely the Hg0 had been in the school since before 1973, when the building was used as a high school. The cleanup costs for the school district approached $200,000. Besides the school, IDPH sampled for airborne Hg0 in 11 homes of children who had played with the Hg0. Fortunately, only one home had enough Hg0 to require a cleanup (University of Wisconsin Extension 2003a; Figure 2).
Table 1

Sources of mercury for spills investigated by the IDPH, West Chicago regional office.

School
Medical facility
HomeaSourcePotentially affected homesbSourcePotentially affected homesc
Number2531125
Container42100
Thermometer, thermostat switch70000
Barometer30000
Switch10000
Manometer30000
Pressure regulator10000
Medical devicesd20025
Unknown41000
Vacuumed60010
Children caused11111?
> 1 to 10 μg/m390101
≥ 10 μg/m393220

uncertain; shoes of both mother and child contaminated, so both may have contributed to contamination.

Homes with indoor spills; does not include homes potentially affected by spills in schools (via children), medical clinics (via patients), or outdoors (24 apartments tested near outdoor spill of unknown cause; no apartments contaminated).

Homes of children who played with Hg0 in one school.

Homes of patients of one medical clinic who had contaminated shoes; the pediatrician instructed a nurse to clean up the mercury with a DustBuster, and then he continued seeing patients.

Includes sphygmomanometers (two) and dilators (one).

Figure 1

Airborne concentrations of Hg0 in a middle school after a 6th-grade student found a container with 4 lb Hg and played with its contents.

Figure 2

Airborne Hg0 concentrations in a home contaminated by a student who played with mercury at school. Abbreviations: BR, bedroom; DR, dining room; FR, family room; KT, kitchen; LR, living room; MBR, master bedroom; SW, southwestern.

Teenagers trespassing at abandoned industrial sites have found Hg0 and subsequently carried contamination into their homes and schools (George et al. 1996). Large Hg0 spills have been caused by broken blood pressure devices (containing about 150 g), other medical instruments (450 g), and old barometers (900 g). Old manometers, which are used to measure pressure, may contain Hg0. IDPH investigated one case involving a 12-kg spill from a manometer. Some natural gas regulators made before 1961 contained Hg0, which was sometimes spilled when the regulators were removed. In Illinois, discovery of this problem triggered a large inspection and cleanup program by natural gas utility companies. One of these companies visually inspected about 300,000 homes. They sampled Hg0 vapor in 154,543 homes and found Hg0 contamination in 1,058 homes (slightly less than 1%). Spills also have occurred when Hg0 is used as a folk remedy or during religious practices. Ingesting Hg0 is a folk remedy used by some cultures to treat alcoholism, colic, constipation, stomachache, or nervousness. Some Hispanic and Caribbean religious practices use Hg0 for good luck, for warding off evil spirits, or as a love potion. Hg0 is sometimes sprinkled in or around a car or crib, carried in an amulet or purse, burned in a candle, or mixed with bath or cleaning water. Most often, Hg0 is sold in small community shops known as botanicas. Two studies performed in Chicago and New York documented the sale of Hg0 in these shops. In Chicago, all 16 botanicas visited by the Chicago Department of Public Health sold Hg0. In New York City, > 90% of the botanicas visited sold Hg0 daily. Many buyers carried Hg0 in sealed containers, but almost one-third of the buyers sprinkled Hg0 in their homes [Chicago Department of Public Health 1997; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2002].

Exposure Routes, Persistence, and Health Effects of Hg0

Inhalation is the main route of concern because 80% of inhaled Hg0 is absorbed. Absorption of Hg0 after ingestion is low. Some exposure through skin can occur, especially if cuts are present. Because the body eliminates mercury slowly, cumulative exposure is important [Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) 1999]. After a large Hg0 spill, the hazard can persist for a long time. In the case of natural gas regulator spills, monitoring found elevated airborne Hg0 > 10 years after it was spilled. Several factors contribute to the persistence of Hg0. Spilled Hg0 forms small beads, which spread, making a thorough cleanup difficult. Hg0 tends to soak into building materials with time, and it generally cannot be removed from porous material, such as carpeting, clothing, drywall, fiberboard, unfinished wood, and upholstered furniture. Children are more sensitive than adults to mercury. Four factors contribute to this: a) Hg0 vapors are heavy and settle, making concentrations higher at floor level, where young children play; b) the blood–brain barrier of children is less able to keep mercury out of the brain; c) the respiration rate of children is higher than that of adults, so children inhale more Hg0 at a given concentration than do adults; and d) the nervous system of children is still developing (ATSDR 1999, 2002, 2004). At room temperature, short-term (acute) health effects from Hg0 are infrequent; however, heating Hg0 increases its evaporation. This can cause very high airborne concentrations and severe acute health effects. In Michigan, four adults melted down tooth fillings to recover the silver. However, these fillings contained about 50% mercury. After 1 day, all four people developed difficulty breathing. Despite medical care, all four patients died within 11–24 days. The home where the fillings were melted down was so contaminated that it had to be destroyed (Taueg et al. 1991). At room temperature, long-term (chronic) exposure may cause adverse health effects. Chronic exposure of 1 month or more to low levels of Hg0 can cause nervous system and kidney damage. Neurologic symptoms of mercury poisoning include decreased nerve impulse conduction, decreased motor skills (e.g., finger tapping and hand–eye coordination), irritability, poor concentration, shyness, tremors (initially affecting the hands and sometimes spreading to other parts of the body), incoordination (e.g., difficulty walking), and short-term memory loss. The motor skill effects may be reversible, but short-term memory loss may be permanent. Other symptoms may include abdominal cramps, diarrhea, eye irritation, nausea, skin rashes, and weight loss. Children may experience acrodynia, which is characterized by pink-colored palms and soles of the feet, excessive sweating, flushing, itching, joint pain, rashes, swelling, weakness, irritability, worry, and trouble sleeping (ATSDR 1999). One study associated chronic exposure of 10–40 μg/m3 with neurologic effects in children (Taueg et al. 1991), but the threshold for effects is uncertain. In workers, one study associated chronic exposure of 26 μg/m3 with neurologic effects. However, some studies reported no neurologic effects at slightly higher concentrations (ATSDR 1999). Misdiagnosis of mercury poisoning, often as a psychological disorder, is a common problem. Before the correct diagnoses, patients often worsen after returning to their contaminated homes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1990; Florentine and Sanfilippo 1991; George et al. 1996; Rennie et al. 1999; Taueg et al. 1991; Tominak et al. 2002; U.S. EPA 2002). In almost all cases, IDPH was called soon after a spill, so significant exposure did not occur. In five old spills, Hg0 levels of concern occurred only in little-used areas of basements (four spills) or a garage (one spill), so significant exposure did not occur. In homes affected by spills from old natural gas regulators, the spills also mainly affected basements, minimizing exposure. To date, IDPH has had only one spill in which children experienced adverse health effects. At the end of the 1993 school year, children were helping move a school chemistry laboratory to another room. One child took home a container with 1 lb Hg0. During the summer, this child and siblings played with Hg0 on table-tops and carpeting and played “tin man” by applying Hg0 to their skin. Symptoms appeared about 1 month later, when two of the children were hospitalized (Table 2). Doctors initially suspected thrombocytopenia, possibly caused by lupus or an infection. The doctors performed many tests for bacterial and viral infectious agents and autoimmune problems, all with negative results. The 10-year-old child almost died twice from respiratory arrest, and he underwent an emergency (and unnecessary) splenectomy, as possible treatment for thrombocytopenia. The correct diagnosis was not made until 3 months after symptoms began, when the children confessed to playing with Hg0. Four months after the children took the Hg0, airborne Hg0 levels in the home measured with Hopcalite (SKC, Inc., Eighty Four, PA) tubes were very high—110 μg/m3 in the living room and 140 μg/m3 in the basement family room.
Table 2

Symptoms and urine Hg concentrations in residents of a home with a Hg spill in Illinois.

PersonSymptomsUrine Hg (μg/L)
MotherUnknown438
FatherUnknown320
10-year-old maleUnable to walk, seizures, rash, nausea, vomiting, fever, cough, rash, thrombocytopenia platelets, melanotic stool with bright red blood1,270
12-year-old maleUnable to stand, nausea, vomiting, rash586
15-year-old femaleUnknown968
17-year-old femaleLow-grade fever, rash, vomiting, thrombocytopenia1,348

Regulatory Standards and Advisories for Hg0

The occupational exposure limit set by the U.S. Occupational Safety Health Administration is 100 μg/m3 as a time-weighted average (TWA) for 8 hr/day, 5 days/week (NIOSH 1997). The American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) recommends a maximum Hg0 concentration of 25 μg/m3 as a TWA for the same exposure duration (ACGIH 1994). Because children are more sensitive than adults to mercury, occupational standards do not apply to them. For Hg0, the recommended limit for continual habitation by children is 0.2 μg/m3, according to the ATSDR (1999). However, this concentration is very hard to achieve after an Hg0 cleanup. For the natural gas regulator spills, the ATSDR and U.S. EPA worked with IDPH to develop suggested action levels for mercury vapors, 1 μg/m3 for clearance and a home evacuation level of 10 μg/m3 in living areas (ATSDR 2000).

Response to Small Hg0 Spills from a Broken Thermometer or Thermostat

IDPH staff receive many calls about broken thermometers. After a broken thermometer incident, IDPH, using a mercury vapor analyzer, has never found airborne Hg0 concentrations > 1 μg/m3. Before September 2000, IDPH used a Jerome 431-X mercury vapor analyzer (Arizona Instrument, Tempe, AZ) for airborne Hg0 measurements. Since then, IDPH uses a Lumex RA915 mercury vapor analyzer (OhioLumex Co., Twinsburg, OH). Once, a mother accidentally dropped a thermometer down a heating duct. Although heat increases the evaporation of Hg0, airborne Hg0 was still < 1 μg/m3. In another investigation involving a broken thermostat, IDPH found Hg0 vapor levels slightly > 1 μg/m3 directly above a bead of Hg0 on the floor. However, concentrations were < 1 μg/m3 a few feet away, so significant exposure would not occur. Consequently, air monitoring is probably not needed after a thermometer or thermostat is broken. Instead, IDPH informs people to pick up visible drops with masking tape or a medicine dropper, ventilate the room and avoid vacuuming the spill area for 2 weeks.

Responding to Large Hg0 Spills

IDPH conservatively classifies anything larger than a broken fever thermometer or thermostat as a large spill. In the case of a large Hg0 spill, measures to reduce the spread of contamination are vital. However, homeowners or janitorial staff should not attempt to clean up a large Hg0 spill. Instead, a professional hazardous waste cleanup company, the state health department, or U.S. EPA should be contacted. A hazardous waste cleanup firm cleaning a residence or school should be familiar with residential cleanups and the ATSDR/U.S. EPA action levels. In one case, a firm unfamiliar with the ATSDR/U.S. EPA action levels did an inadequate cleanup of a school using only a special vacuum equipped with a filter to contain Hg0. Further cleanup was required. After a large spill, IDPH recommends family members leave their home or apartment, particularly if young children or pregnant women are present, and will refer the family to an occupational physician familiar with mercury poisoning to monitor exposure. Several tests will show the amount of mercury in the body. If an acute exposure to Hg0 has occurred, a blood analysis will show mercury levels if performed within 3 days after the exposure. In adults, the background concentration of mercury is normally < 1.5 μg/dL blood (IDPH 2004b). If a chronic, low-level exposure is suspected, a 24-hr urine specimen is the best measure of Hg0. If a 24-hr specimen is not possible, the first morning void is the best substitute. For adults, the normal background concentration of mercury in urine is < 20 μg/L (IDPH 2004b). The extent and cost of an Hg0 cleanup often depend more on the spread of contamination than on the actual amount of Hg0 spilled. So before the arrival of a qualified cleanup crew, IDPH recommends a number of actions to reduce the risk of further contamination. Shoes can easily track Hg0, so removing them before leaving a room where a spill has occurred can prevent this. (IDPH staff use nonslip, chemically protective disposable booties to avoid contaminating shoes). Hg0 also can be spread throughout a home if it is on a person’s clothes. Additional methods to reduce the spread of Hg0 include limiting the number of people entering a home, covering the affected floor with plastic, and ensuring that any investigation of the spill moves from the least contaminated area to the most contaminated area before exiting through the nearest door. The following examples that IDPH has investigated show how important it is to minimize the spread of contamination (University of Wisconsin Extension 2003b). Several children were using a medical device, containing 1 lb Hg0, as a toy. In the course of their play, the children broke the device, splattering a crib, the wall, and the carpeting. The children’s father did nearly everything correctly: He put plastic on the floor of the room in which the spill occurred, changed shoes upon leaving the room, and kept his family out of the room until he could get them out of the home. However, he failed to check his children’s clothing after the device was broken. By the time the family left the home 2 hr after the spill, the children had spread Hg0 from their contaminated clothing to every room of the house (Figure 3). Initial concentrations in the spill room would have been higher, but a window was open. Subsequent increases in airborne Hg0 concentrations in other rooms suggested tracking by cleanup workers.
Figure 3

Airborne Hg0 concentrations after children broke a medical device with one pound of mercury. Abbreviations: BR, bedroom; E, eastern; KT, kitchen; LR, living room; MBR, master bedroom; SE, southeastern.

The family ultimately lost approximately 80% of the personal property in their home, including all the carpeting and most of the furniture. If the children (and cleanup workers) had not spread the Hg0, the cleanup would have been limited to just one room, thereby requiring less time and expense; the personal property loss would have been minimized, and the family could have returned home much sooner. In some cases where Hg0 is spread throughout a home, the cleanup costs can exceed the value of the home. This example underscores the importance of minimizing the spread of Hg0 after a spill. Also, never assume that a child who has been playing with Hg0 is uncontaminated. A second example illustrates the danger of using a conventional vacuum to clean up Hg0 (Figure 4). Conventional vacuuming heats the Hg0 and blows it into the air, spreading fine droplets and increasing airborne concentrations. In addition, the vacuum becomes permanently contaminated and must be discarded. In this particular spill, a jar containing 13 lb Hg0 fell off a kitchen pantry shelf and broke on the kitchen carpeting. The homeowner called the local fire department. Fire department personnel, rather than contacting a local hazardous materials team, vacuumed the Hg0.
Figure 4

Airborne Hg0 concentrations after vacuuming. Abbreviations: BR, bedroom; KT, kitchen; LR, living room.

Several subsequent cleanup attempts failed because the vacuuming had contaminated all surfaces in the kitchen. Ultimately, the entire kitchen had to be gutted. The ceiling, floor, and walls had to be removed, and all appliances and cabinets had to be discarded. Fortunately for the homeowner, two closed doors protected the rest of the home from serious contamination. If the entire house had been contaminated, cleanup costs could have exceeded the value of the home. Factors affecting airborne Hg0 concentrations include not only the amount spilled but also ventilation, temperature, and the surface area of the Hg0 droplets (affected by dispersal). Consequently, the extent of airborne Hg0 concentration is hard to predict, making monitoring necessary. After taking measures to reduce the spread of contamination, IDPH uses monitoring instruments to assess airborne concentrations and the extent of contamination. The accuracy of the measurements depends on the instrument used and, with some instruments, can be affected by interferences from other chemicals present in the air (e.g., ammonia, cat urine, chlorine bleach, tobacco smoke). Air sampling with Hopcalite absorbent tubes and sampling pumps can be done for clearance sampling after a cleanup has been performed, but they require laboratory analysis. The Lumex mercury vapor analyzer provides real-time results and accuracy comparable with that of Hopcalite tubes. Hg0 evaporates slowly, so for meaningful results, windows should be closed at least overnight and preferably for 24 hr before any measurement is taken. In one case, a contractor measured airborne Hg0 concentrations in a home with windows opened, and they found Hg0 only in the basement. IDPH checked the home after windows were closed overnight, and airborne Hg0 concentrations throughout the home exceeded 10 μg/m3 (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Effect of open windows on airborne mercury concentrations. Abbreviations: BR, bedroom; KT, kitchen; LR, living room; MBR, master bedroom; N, northern; NE, northeastern; NW, northwestern.

Usually, cleanup of a spill site must be done before it can be determined whether airborne Hg0 away from the spill site is from the tracking of Hg0 or from the airborne dispersal of vapors. However, as an indirect indicator, the shoes of occupants can be tested for contamination. If the shoes are uncontaminated, airborne Hg0 contamination away from the spill site is likely due to airborne dispersion of vapors rather than tracking. If the shoes are contaminated, some tracking of the Hg0 probably occurred. IDPH has found that, because of tracking, cleanup of a room where a spill has occurred does not usually reduce airborne Hg0 levels to < 1 μg/m3, and further efforts are needed. In instances where cleaning the floors of a home fails to reduce the Hg0 to acceptable levels, IDPH staff may turn their attention to household items, such as furniture, that may require decontamination or disposal. This occurred in one case after a 1-lb Hg0 spill. After cleaning the floors of the home did not reduce Hg0 concentrations to acceptable levels, the resident placed all household contents in the back yard and wrapped or bagged them in plastic. IDPH staff then tested the bagged/wrapped contents for contamination. Using a Jerome mercury vapor analyzer, initial readings ranged from < 10 μg/m3 to > 20 μg/m3. Rather than recommending the immediate disposal of contaminated items, IDPH staff suggested leaving them outside for 1–2 months during the summer to see if some of the Hg0 would dissipate. This approach will work only in a warm location because Hg0 evaporation slows during cool or cold weather. Bagged items with initial readings < 10 μg/m3 usually showed a decline to less than the 2-μg/m3 detection limit of a Jerome within a month. Follow-up readings for those items with findings of between 10 and 20 μg/m3 were different depending on the type of material. For hard-surfaced items, Hg0 levels generally declined to < 2 μg/m3; porous items, however, often remained contaminated. Items with initial readings > 20 μg/m3 showed little decline in contamination levels. Testing of bagged items is a very sensitive method for detecting contamination. However, the airborne concentration of Hg0 a contaminated item may produce in the home is unknown. In one case, a child’s shoes gave a reading of 16 μg/m3 when placed in a plastic bag. Before this, however, a Jerome detected no Hg0 on the shoes, even when held just an inch from the shoes. Another factor that may complicate successfully reducing indoor Hg0 contamination in air to 1 μg/m3 is the ability of Hg0 to seep into building components. For example, in the case of two old spills, airborne Hg0 concentrations in basements measured with Hopcalite tubes slightly exceeded the 1 μg/m3 threshold even after the areas had been cleaned and ventilated. However, upstairs Hg0 levels were < 1 μg/m3. Because both basements were infrequently used, the homeowners chose to live with the elevated levels in their basements rather than to remove the concrete floors. More recently, cleanup contractors have applied an epoxy sealant to such floors, effectively reducing airborne Hg0 concentrations.

Step-by-Step Handling of a Large Hg0 Spill

Figure 6 gives the procedures for cleaning an Hg0 spill. Hg0 can be cleaned up with sulfur or with a mercury spill kit (zinc). Both convert Hg0 into a less volatile form, but because powdered sulfur is very flammable, a mercury spill kit is the safer choice. The contents of the mercury spill kit are spread on the floor and worked into the cracks with a broom. Extended contact time is not necessary because zinc (and sulfur) reacts rapidly with any Hg0 that is present. The residue is then picked up with a broom and dustpan. Next, the surface should be washed with trisodium phosphate detergent and water. Some cleanup firms use nitric acid or an Hg0 removal solvent instead of a mercury spill kit. Hazardous waste cleanup firms often use vacuums with special Hg0 filters that pick up gross contamination. However, further cleanup generally is needed to reach the ATSDR/U.S. EPA clearance level. Contaminated hard surfaces—for example, linoleum, hardwood floors with a good finish, metal, plastic, or tile—are usually cleaned rather easily. Porous items, such as carpeting, clothing, fiberboard, unfinished wood, and upholstered furniture, that become contaminated generally cannot be cleaned and must be discarded.
Figure 6

Handling Hg0 spills.

Hg0 Disposal

The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency periodically has household hazardous waste collections and also sponsors permanent collection facilities where residents can take Hg0 (and other chemicals) for free disposal (Appendix 1). Companies and schools must pay for disposal. Illinois has had pilot programs to assist schools in getting rid of mercury, but not on a permanent or statewide basis. For other states, contact the state environmental protection agency or the U.S. EPA regional office.
Appendix 1

Mercury websites.

Dates and locations of Illinois household hazardous waste pickup days and the locations of Illinois permanent collection facilities
  http://www.epa.state.il.us/land/hazardous-waste/household-haz-waste/index.html
Educational websites on mercury developed by IDPH
 Mercury in schools website (IDPH 2004c)
  http://www.idph.state.il.us/mercury/
 Mercury in schools fact sheet (IDPH 2004d)
  http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/pdf/mercuryschool.pdf
 Mercury fact sheet for health professionals (IDPH 2004b)
  http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/factsheets/mercuryhlthprof.htm
 Mercury spill fact sheet (IDPH 2004a)
  http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/factsheets/mercuryspills.htm

Preventing Hg0 Spills

The best way to prevent spills is to keep Hg0 out of the home, school, or workplace. The U.S. EPA (1999) has recommended that Hg0 no longer be used for blood pressure and other medical devices, barometers, manometers, thermometers, or thermostats. The agency advises that these devices be replaced with Hg0-free alternatives, which are just as accurate and similar in cost. After one Hg0 spill in a nursing home, the Hg0 sphygmomanometer manufacturer told the facility not to replace their sphygmomanometers with nonmercury sphygmomanometers because the nonmercury devices were less accurate. However, several studies have shown that non-Hg0 blood pressure devices are equally accurate when calibrated annually, as recommended (Canzanello et al. 2001; Rouse and Marshall 2001; Yarows and Qian 2001). Health care workers, the public, and school personnel should be educated about the hazards of Hg0, the availability of alternatives, and the cost of Hg0 cleanup. They need to know that Hg0 is almost worthless, not a valuable substance to be kept in the home as an investment. To aid in this education, IDPH has developed a mercury website and several educational pamphlets (Appendix 1).

Mercury in the Environment

When Hg0 is released from industry, schools, or homes, it can end up settling into lakes and streams, where bacteria change it into methylmercury, a more toxic form. Methylmercury accumulates in animals and can reach high concentrations in fish. In fact, 37 states, including Illinois, have issued warnings about eating certain fish because of mercury contamination (U.S. EPA 1999).

Conclusions

The best way to prevent Hg0 spills is not to store Hg0 in the home, school, or workplace. Because large Hg0 spills may cause hazardous conditions, particularly for children, and may pollute the environment, it is not advisable for homeowners or janitorial staff to undertake the cleanup. Such cleanups, which can be expensive, are best done by hazardous waste firms that are qualified to perform this work. To reduce the chances of a spill occurring, alternatives to Hg0-containing devices (e.g., thermometers, barometers, manometers, and blood pressure and other medical devices) should be used in homes, schools, medical facilities, and workplaces. Such devices are widely available and comparable in cost and work equally well. The adoption of these recommendations depends, however, on an informed public. People need to be educated about the hazards of Hg0, the costs of cleaning it up, and the availability of Hg0-free products.
  9 in total

1.  Mercury poisoning after spillage at home from a sphygmomanometer on loan from hospital.

Authors:  A C Rennie; M McGregor-Schuerman; I M Dale; C Robinson; R McWilliam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?

Authors:  V J Canzanello; P L Jensen; G L Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-03-12

3.  The extent and implications of sphygmomanometer calibration error in primary care.

Authors:  A Rouse; T Marshall
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometers in clinical usage: University of Michigan experience.

Authors:  S A Yarows; K Qian
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  Elemental mercury as an attractive nuisance: multiple exposures from a pilfered school supply with severe consequences.

Authors:  R Tominack; J Weber; C Blume; M Madhok; T Murphy; M Thompson; A Scalzo
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.454

6.  Elemental mercury poisoning in a household--Ohio, 1989.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1990-06-29       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Elemental mercury poisoning.

Authors:  M J Florentine; D J Sanfilippo
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1991-03

8.  Acute and chronic poisoning from residential exposures to elemental mercury--Michigan, 1989-1990.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1991-06-14       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Public health consequences of mercury spills: Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance system, 1993-1998.

Authors:  Perri Zeitz; Maureen F Orr; Wendy E Kaye
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  Carbamodithioate-based dual functional fluorescent probe for Hg(2+) and S(2-).

Authors:  Xiaohong Cheng; Shuang Li; Zhicheng Zhong; Song Wang; Ping He
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Acute mercury poisoning among children in two provinces of Turkey.

Authors:  Kursat Bora Carman; Engin Tutkun; Hinc Yilmaz; Cengiz Dilber; Tahir Dalkiran; Baris Cakir; Didem Arslantas; Yildirim Cesaretli; Selin Aktaş Aykanat
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Indoor and outdoor elemental mercury: a comparison of three different cases.

Authors:  G Loupa; C Polyzou; A M Zarogianni; K Ouzounis; S Rapsomanikis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Japanese Acupuncture, in the Pacific War and Beyond.

Authors:  Yiu Ming Wong
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Converting a potential agency crisis into community success: mercury recycling program following elemental mercury exposures in Amarillo, Texas, 2004.

Authors:  J Rush Pierce; Deree Duke; Hector Mendoza
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  A review of events that expose children to elemental mercury in the United States.

Authors:  Robin Lee; Dan Middleton; Kathleen Caldwell; Steve Dearwent; Steven Jones; Brian Lewis; Carolyn Monteilh; Mary Ellen Mortensen; Richard Nickle; Kenneth Orloff; Meghan Reger; John Risher; Helen Schurz Rogers; Michelle Watters
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Mercury in traditional medicines: is cinnabar toxicologically similar to common mercurials?

Authors:  Jie Liu; Jing-Zheng Shi; Li-Mei Yu; Robert A Goyer; Michael P Waalkes
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2008-04-29

8.  Directly writing flexible temperature sensor with graphene nanoribbons for disposable healthcare devices.

Authors:  Xue Gong; Long Zhang; Yinan Huang; Shuguang Wang; Gebo Pan; Liqiang Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  Characteristics and treatment of elemental mercury intoxication: A case series.

Authors:  Kelly Johnson-Arbor; Eshetu Tefera; John Farrell
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04

10.  Mercury vapor release from broken compact fluorescent lamps and in situ capture by new nanomaterial sorbents.

Authors:  Natalie C Johnson; Shawn Manchester; Love Sarin; Yuming Gao; Indrek Kulaots; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.