Literature DB >> 16450207

Is inflammation a causal chain between low socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes? Results from the KORA Survey 2000.

Wolfgang Rathmann1, Burkhard Haastert, Guido Giani, Wolfgang Koenig, Armin Imhof, Christian Herder, Rolf Holle, Andreas Mielck.   

Abstract

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with type 2 diabetes. Inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) are predictive of diabetes. It is unclear, whether inflammation may be a mechanism linking low SES to type 2 diabetes. In the population-based KORA Survey 2000, 766 men and 710 women aged 55 to 74 years were randomly selected in the Augsburg region (Southern Germany). An index for SES was defined using education, occupation, and income. In women but not in men, increased CRP concentrations were found with lower SES (p<0.01). This significant trend was no longer observed after adjusting for BMI and waist circumference (p=0.23). Low SES was significantly associated with the age-adjusted odds of having type 2 diabetes both in men (OR; 95%CI: 1.35; 1.14-1.60) and in women (2.01; 1.37-2.96). The risk of having diabetes associated with low SES was only slightly changed after adjusting for CRP, which was itself significantly related to diabetes. In multivariate analyses, adjusting for age, obesity, physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, and CRP, low SES yielded only a borderline statistical significance in women (p=0.07), whereas no significant association with diabetes remained in men (p=0.14). After CRP was dropped from the full model, there was no change in the OR obtained for low SES (men: 1.30; 0.92-1.83; women: 1.54; 0.97-2.45). Low SES was not related to prediabetes (IFG, IGT), whereas CRP was significantly associated with diabetes precursors. In conclusion, inflammation appears not to play a major role linking low SES and type 2 diabetes in the elderly population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16450207     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-005-5085-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  27 in total

1.  Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas.

Authors:  V Connolly; N Unwin; P Sherriff; R Bilous; W Kelly
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Capture-recapture-adjusted prevalence rates of type 2 diabetes are related to social deprivation.

Authors:  A A Ismail; N J Beeching; G V Gill; M A Bellis
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1999-12

3.  Association between plasma fibrinogen concentration and five socioeconomic indices in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study.

Authors:  T W Wilson; G A Kaplan; J Kauhanen; R D Cohen; M Wu; R Salonen; J T Salonen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Sex differences in the associations of socioeconomic status with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the elderly population: the KORA Survey 2000.

Authors:  W Rathmann; B Haastert; A Icks; G Giani; R Holle; C Meisinger; A Mielck
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Sex differences in the association of socioeconomic status with obesity.

Authors:  Jane Wardle; Jo Waller; Martin J Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Gender-related differences in the association between socioeconomic status and self-reported diabetes.

Authors:  Mei Tang; Yue Chen; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Influences on the variation in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between general practices: practice, patient or socioeconomic factors?

Authors:  David L Whitford; Simon J Griffin; A Toby Prevost
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Explanations of socioeconomic differences in excess risk of type 2 diabetes in Swedish men and women.

Authors:  Emilie E Agardh; Anders Ahlbom; Tomas Andersson; Suad Efendic; Valdemar Grill; Johan Hallqvist; Claes-Göran Ostenson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  14 in total

1.  Systemic inflammation and the metabolic syndrome among middle-aged community volunteers.

Authors:  Anna L Marsland; Jeanne M McCaffery; Matthew F Muldoon; Stephen B Manuck
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 2.  Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health.

Authors:  Karen A Matthews; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Inflammation a possible link between economical stress and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Katalin Gémes; Staffan Ahnve; Imre Janszky
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Sex and gender in psychoneuroimmunology research: past, present and future.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; Edward C Suarez
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  To assess, to control, to exclude: effects of biobehavioral factors on circulating inflammatory markers.

Authors:  Mary-Frances O'Connor; Julie E Bower; Hyong Jin Cho; J David Creswell; Stoyan Dimitrov; Mary E Hamby; Michael A Hoyt; Jennifer L Martin; Theodore F Robles; Erica K Sloan; Kamala S Thomas; Michael R Irwin
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 7.217

6.  Health behaviours, socioeconomic status and diabetes incidence: the Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab).

Authors:  E D Williams; R J Tapp; D J Magliano; J E Shaw; P Z Zimmet; B F Oldenburg
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Stroke disparities in older Americans: is wealth a more powerful indicator of risk than income and education?

Authors:  Mauricio Avendano; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  The social patterns of a biological risk factor for disease: race, gender, socioeconomic position, and C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Pamela Herd; Amelia Karraker; Elliot Friedman
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Association of socioeconomic status with inflammation markers in black and white men and women in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

Authors:  Tara L Gruenewald; Sheldon Cohen; Karen A Matthews; Russell Tracy; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Socioeconomic status and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: data from the Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Timothy C Lee; Robert J Glynn; Jessica M Peña; Nina P Paynter; David Conen; Paul M Ridker; Aruna D Pradhan; Julie E Buring; Michelle A Albert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.