Literature DB >> 16449557

Constrained optimization in human running.

Anne K Gutmann1, Brian Jacobi, Michael T Butcher, John E A Bertram.   

Abstract

Walking humans spontaneously select different speed, frequency and step length combinations, depending on which of these three parameters is specified. This behavior can be explained by constrained optimization of cost of transport (metabolic cost/distance) where cost of transport is seen as the main component of an underlying objective function that is minimized within the limitations of specified constraints. It is then of interest to ask whether or not such results are specific to walking only, or indicate a more general feature of locomotion control. The current study examines running gait selection within the framework of constrained optimization by comparing self-selected running gaits to the gaits predicted by constrained optimization of a cost surface constructed from cost data available in the literature. Normalizing speed and frequency values in the behavioral data by preferred speed and frequency reduced inter-subject variability and made group behavioral trends more visible. Although actual behavior did not coincide exactly with running cost optimization, self-selected gait and predictions from the general human cost surface did agree to within the 95% confidence interval and the region of minimal cost+0.005 ml O2 kg(-1) m(-1). This was similar to the level of agreement between actual and predicted behavior observed in walking. Thus, there seems to be substantial evidence to suggest that (i) selection of gait parameters in running can largely be predicted using constrained optimization, and (ii) general cost surfaces can be constructed using metabolic data from one group that will largely predict the behavior of other groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449557     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of the minimum energy hypothesis and other potential optimality criteria for human running.

Authors:  Ross H Miller; Brian R Umberger; Joseph Hamill; Graham E Caldwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Designing polyHEMA substrates that mimic the viscoelastic response of soft tissue.

Authors:  Brian Holt; Anubhav Tripathi; Jeffrey R Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Viscoelastic response of human skin to low magnitude physiologically relevant shear.

Authors:  Brian Holt; Anubhav Tripathi; Jeffrey Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Compass gait mechanics account for top walking speeds in ducks and humans.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Katie L Szymanek; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Is the brain a resource-cheapskate?

Authors:  Liat Goldfarb; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Minimally Actuated Walking: Identifying Core Challenges to Economical Legged Locomotion Reveals Novel Solutions.

Authors:  Ryan T Schroeder; John Ea Bertram
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-05-22

7.  Humans Optimize Ground Contact Time and Leg Stiffness to Minimize the Metabolic Cost of Running.

Authors:  Isabel S Moore; Kelly J Ashford; Charlotte Cross; Jack Hope; Holly S R Jones; Molly McCarthy-Ryan
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-11-04

8.  Elastic energy savings and active energy cost in a simple model of running.

Authors:  Ryan T Schroeder; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Music in the exercise domain: a review and synthesis (Part II).

Authors:  Costas I Karageorghis; David-Lee Priest
Journal:  Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2011-12-07

10.  Adaptive Remodeling of Achilles Tendon: A Multi-scale Computational Model.

Authors:  Stuart R Young; Bruce Gardiner; Arash Mehdizadeh; Jonas Rubenson; Brian Umberger; David W Smith
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.