Literature DB >> 16449123

Women's views of prenatal violence screening: acceptability and confidentiality issues.

Paula Rinard Renker1, Peggy Tonkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to address the need for evidenced-based practices for violence screening by identifying women's perceptions of, and experiences with, prenatal violence screening.
METHODS: Audio- and video-enhanced anonymous computer interviews were completed by women in 2 Level III postpartum units.
RESULTS: The sample was composed of 519 primarily African-American and white women who were educationally and economically diverse. Although 312 women (60.1%) reported being screened for violence by a health care provider at some point during their pregnancy, only 201 of 519 (38.7%) were asked by their prenatal care provider, with the remaining women reporting that they were screened during emergency room, triage visits, and labor and delivery admission. Of those who were screened by their prenatal care provider 195 of 201 (97%) women stated that they were not embarrassed, angry, or offended when assessed. Of the 66 women who were both abused and screened during their pregnancy, only 11 women disclosed abuse, with a resulting disclosure rate of 16.7%; however, 29 abused women who denied abuse to their health care provider stated that they would have changed their response if they had known that violence disclosure was not reportable in their state unless the victim was seriously injured or was wounded with a lethal weapon.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the great majority of pregnant women are not offended when screened for domestic violence and may increase their disclosure if they are told about state reporting mandates that preclude mandatory reporting for adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449123     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000195356.90589.c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  17 in total

1.  Women's perspectives on screening for alcohol and drug use in prenatal care.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Amani Nuru-Jeter
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010 May-Jun

2.  The anatomy of a community health center system-level intervention for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Karin V Rhodes; Jeane Ann Grisso; Melissa Rodgers; Mira Gohel; Marcy Witherspoon; Martha Davis; Sandra Dempsey; Paul Crits-Christoph
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Generalised anxiety disorder: the importance of life context and social factors.

Authors:  Lynda Tait; Giles Berrisford
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Correlates of Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: Results from a National Survey of Canadian Women.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Maureen Heaman; Marcelo Urquia; Patricia O'Campo; Patricia Janssen; Kellie Thiessen; Janet Smylie
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-04

Review 5.  Current Reports on Perinatal Intimate Partner Violence.

Authors:  Donna E Stewart; Simone N Vigod; Harriet L MacMillan; Prabha S Chandra; Alice Han; Marta B Rondon; Jennifer C D MacGregor; Ekaterina Riazantseva
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Intimate partner violence, depression, and PTSD among pregnant Latina women.

Authors:  Michael A Rodriguez; MarySue V Heilemann; Eve Fielder; Alfonso Ang; Faustina Nevarez; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Sheila McDonald; Anne Biringer; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sarah McDonald; Rebecca Giallo; Arto Ohinmaa; Gerri Lasiuk; Glenda MacQueen; Wendy Sword; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Acceptance of routine or case-based inquiry for intimate partner violence: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Heidi Stöckl; Linda Hertlein; Isabelle Himsl; Nina Ditsch; Carolin Blume; Uwe Hasbargen; Klaus Friese; Doris Stöckl
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, superiority trial comparing the clinical and cost- effectiveness of integrated online mental health assessment-referral-care in pregnancy to usual prenatal care on prenatal and postnatal mental health and infant health and development: the Integrated Maternal Psychosocial Assessment to Care Trial (IMPACT).

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sheila McDonald; Gerri Lasiuk; Sarah McDonald; Maureen Heaman; Anne Biringer; Wendy Sword; Rebecca Giallo; Tejal Patel; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Prevalence and evolution of intimate partner violence before and during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  An-Sofie Van Parys; Ellen Deschepper; Kristien Michielsen; Marleen Temmerman; Hans Verstraelen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.