BACKGROUND: Screening for alcohol and drug use in prenatal care is widely promoted in the United States as a public health strategy for reducing alcohol and drug use during pregnancy. However, the published literature does not consider women's perspectives or the potential negative ramifications of screening. METHODS: Twenty semistructured interviews and two focus groups (n = 38) were conducted with a racially/ethnically diverse sample of low-income pregnant and parenting women using alcohol and/or drugs in a northern California county. RESULTS: Most women were averse to having drug but not alcohol use identified and were mistrustful of providers' often inconspicuous efforts to discover drug use. Women expected psychological, social, and legal consequences from being identified, including feelings of maternal failure, judgment by providers, and reports to Child Protective Services. Women did not trust providers to protect them from these consequences. Rather, they took steps to protect themselves. They avoided and emotionally disengaged from prenatal care, attempted to stop using substances that could be detected by urine tests before prenatal care visits, and shared strategies within social networks for gaining the benefits of prenatal care while avoiding its negative consequences. CONCLUSION: Considerations of the public health impact of screening for drug use in prenatal care should account for the implications of women's physical avoidance of and emotional disengagement from prenatal care, specifically the direct effects of late, limited, and no prenatal care on pregnancy outcomes and missed opportunities for health promoting interventions. Copyright 2010 Jacobs Institute of Women
BACKGROUND: Screening for alcohol and drug use in prenatal care is widely promoted in the United States as a public health strategy for reducing alcohol and drug use during pregnancy. However, the published literature does not consider women's perspectives or the potential negative ramifications of screening. METHODS: Twenty semistructured interviews and two focus groups (n = 38) were conducted with a racially/ethnically diverse sample of low-income pregnant and parenting women using alcohol and/or drugs in a northern California county. RESULTS: Most women were averse to having drug but not alcohol use identified and were mistrustful of providers' often inconspicuous efforts to discover drug use. Women expected psychological, social, and legal consequences from being identified, including feelings of maternal failure, judgment by providers, and reports to Child Protective Services. Women did not trust providers to protect them from these consequences. Rather, they took steps to protect themselves. They avoided and emotionally disengaged from prenatal care, attempted to stop using substances that could be detected by urine tests before prenatal care visits, and shared strategies within social networks for gaining the benefits of prenatal care while avoiding its negative consequences. CONCLUSION: Considerations of the public health impact of screening for drug use in prenatal care should account for the implications of women's physical avoidance of and emotional disengagement from prenatal care, specifically the direct effects of late, limited, and no prenatal care on pregnancy outcomes and missed opportunities for health promoting interventions. Copyright 2010 Jacobs Institute of Women
Authors: Ayman El-Mohandes; Allen A Herman; M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Pragathi S Katta; Davene White; Lawrence Grylack Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Renee Milligan; Barbara K Wingrove; Leslie Richards; Margaret Rodan; Lillie Monroe-Lord; Velishie Jackson; Barbara Hatcher; Cynthia Harris; Cassandra Henderson; Allan A Johnson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2002-11-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Maja A Kwiatkowski; Annerine Roos; Dan J Stein; Kevin G F Thomas; Kirsty Donald Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2013-12-28 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Judy C Chang; Jill A Tarr; Cynthia L Holland; Natacha M De Genna; Gale A Richardson; Keri L Rodriguez; Jeanelle Sheeder; Kevin L Kraemer; Nancy L Day; Doris Rubio; Marian Jarlenski; Robert M Arnold Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Meenakshi S Subbaraman; Sue Thomas; Ryan Treffers; Kevin Delucchi; William C Kerr; Priscilla Martinez; Sarah C M Roberts Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.455