Literature DB >> 16448004

Rec-I-DCM3: a fast algorithmic technique for reconstructing large phylogenetic trees.

Usman W Roshan1, Bernard M Moret, Tandy Warnow, Tiffani L Williams.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees are commonly reconstructed based on hard optimization problems such as maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML). Conventional MP heuristics for producing phylogenetic trees produce good solutions within reasonable time on small datasets (up to a few thousand sequences), while ML heuristics are limited to smaller datasets (up to a few hundred sequences). However, since MP (and presumably ML) is NP-hard, such approaches do not scale when applied to large datasets. In this paper, we present a new technique called Recursive-Iterative-DCM3 (Rec-I-DCM3), which belongs to our family of Disk-Covering Methods (DCMs). We tested this new technique on ten large biological datasets ranging from 1,322 to 13,921 sequences and obtained dramatic speedups as well as significant improvements in accuracy (better than 99.99%) in comparison to existing approaches. Thus, high-quality reconstructions can be obtained for datasets at least ten times larger than was previously possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16448004     DOI: 10.1109/csb.2004.1332422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf        ISSN: 1551-7497


  15 in total

Review 1.  Taking the first steps towards a standard for reporting on phylogenies: Minimum Information About a Phylogenetic Analysis (MIAPA).

Authors:  Jim Leebens-Mack; Todd Vision; Eric Brenner; John E Bowers; Steven Cannon; Mark J Clement; Clifford W Cunningham; Claude dePamphilis; Rob deSalle; Jeff J Doyle; Jonathan A Eisen; Xun Gu; John Harshman; Robert K Jansen; Elizabeth A Kellogg; Eugene V Koonin; Brent D Mishler; Hervé Philippe; J Chris Pires; Yin-Long Qiu; Seung Y Rhee; Kimmen Sjölander; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Dennis W Stevenson; Kerr Wall; Tandy Warnow; Christian Zmasek
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2006

2.  Robinson-Foulds supertrees.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Rec-DCM-Eigen: reconstructing a less parsimonious but more accurate tree in shorter time.

Authors:  Seunghwa Kang; Jijun Tang; Stephen W Schaeffer; David A Bader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Polynomial supertree methods revisited.

Authors:  Malte Brinkmeyer; Thasso Griebel; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-21

6.  DACTAL: divide-and-conquer trees (almost) without alignments.

Authors:  Serita Nelesen; Kevin Liu; Li-San Wang; C Randal Linder; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance.

Authors:  Christopher Whidden; Norbert Zeh; Robert G Beiko
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Disk covering methods improve phylogenomic analyses.

Authors:  Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; Tyler Hunt; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Efficient tree searches with available algorithms.

Authors:  Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 1.625

10.  Using tree diversity to compare phylogenetic heuristics.

Authors:  Seung-Jin Sul; Suzanne Matthews; Tiffani L Williams
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.